Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 7;16(6):1080. doi: 10.3390/cancers16061080

Table 4.

Cox multivariate analysis of factors associated with poor survival 18 months after Sorafenib initiation using SarcoMELD composite variable. (A) Training group; (B) Validation group.

(A) Training Group
Variable HR (95% CI) p-Value
SarcoMELD 1.42 (1.12–1.8) 0.004
AFP > 25 ng/mL 1.43 (0.99–2.05) 0.053
Ascites 1.35 (0.89–2.03) 0.157
Macrovascular invasion 1.3 (0.86–1.98) 0.213
ECOG–PS 1.19 (0.95–1.47) 0.124
CLIP 1.06 (0.85–1.33) 0.583
PROSASH-II risk groups 1.89 (0.89–1.58) 0.237
(B) Validation Group
Variable HR (95% CI) p -Value
SarcoMELD 1.88 (1.17–3.04) 0.009
AFP > 25 ng/mL 1.09 (0.69–1.73) 0.696
Albumin < 3.8 g/dL 1.59 (0.86–2.97) 0.142
Age > 75 years 0.58 (0.3–1.11) 0.1
ECOG–PS 1.5 (1.12–2.01) 0.006
PROSASH-II risk groups 1.03 (0.72–1.48) 0.875

Data are expressed as Hazard Ratio and 95% Confidence Interval. Multivariate analysis for OS was made using the Cox proportional hazards model. Significant p-values are highlighted in bold. Abbreviations: AFP, Alpha-fetoprotein; CLIP, Cancer Liver Italian Program; ECOG-PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; MELD, Model for End stage Liver Disease; PROSASH-II, Prediction of Survival in Advanced Sorafenib-treated HCC-II.