Table 5.
(Author, Year of Publication) | Pre-Surgery IKDC Score | Post-Surgery IKDC Score | Pre-Surgery Lysholm Score | Post-Surgery Lysholm Score | Other Outcomes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pre-Surgery | Post-Surgery | |||||
(Abdelkafy and Said, 2014) [11] | Objective: Grade B (1), Grade C (10), Grade D (2) Subjective: 15.4 ± 4.2 |
Objective: Grade A (12), Grade B (1) Subjective: 80.5 ± 16.7 |
3.8 ± 2.5 | 91.2 ± 8.9 | VAS: 8.5 ± 1.2 (pain) | VAS: 9.6 ± 0.5 (operation satisfaction), 0.4 ± 0.5 (pain) |
(Brunner et al., 2016) [12] | NR | Objective Group A: Grade A (10), Grade B (5) Objective Group B: Grade A (7), Grade B (3) Subjective: NA |
NR | Group A: 94.1 ± 8.1 Group B: 90.1 ± 10.2 |
NR | Rollimeter difference to ipsilateral knee (mm): Group A: 0.5 ± 0.8 Group B: 0.5 ± 0.7 |
(Caglar et al., 2021) [13] | NR | Objective: NR Subjective: 6 months: 82.3 (68–91); 12 months: 91.4 (81–100); 24 months: 95.7 (89–100) |
NR | NR | NR | NR |
(Callanan et al., 2019) [14] | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | Time to radiographic union: 2.1 years (suture); 4.3 years (screw) |
(Casalonga et al., 2010) [15] | NR | Objective: Grade A (4), Grade B (4), Grade C (4), Grade D (1) Subjective: 91 (mailed, n = 10), 81 (at follow-up, n = 13) |
NR | NR | NR | ARPEGE Score: 8.3 |
(Chalopin et al., 2022) [16] | NR | Objective: Grade A (14), Grade B (3) Subjective: 97 ± 2.46 |
NR | 99.1 ± 1.62 | NR | NR |
(Chotel et al., 2016) [17] | NR | Objective: Grade A (9), Grade B (3), Grade C (1) Subjective: 97 (91–100) |
NR | 97.36 (94–100) | NR | NR |
(D’ambrosio et al., 2022) [18] | NR | Objective: NR Subjective: 93.8 ± 6.4 |
NR | 93.1 ± 9.8 | NR | Average return to sport time: 9.1 ± 9.5 months Average Tegner Score: 5.6 ± 1.5 |
(Edmonds et al., 2015) [19] | NR | NR | NR | Arthroscopic: 95 Open: 97.4 Conservative: 86 |
NR | Pain (0–10): Arthroscopic: 0.2 Open: 0.7 Conservative: 2.7 |
(Furlan et al., 2010) [20] | NR | Objective: Grade A (8), Grade B (2) Subjective: 96 (85–100) |
NR | NR | NR | NR |
(Hirschmann et al., 2009) [21] | NR | Objective: Grade A (5), Grade B (1) Subjective: 197 ± 4 |
NR | 97 ± 3 | Tegner Score: 8 (6–9) | VAS: 0.5 ± 0.8 (pain), 9.5 ± 1.5 (satisfaction) Tegner Score: 8 (6–9) |
(Jaaskela et al., 2023) [22] | NR | Objective: NR Subjective: 93.1 ± 13.5 (open osteosuture), 90.4 ± 14.5 (arthroscopic screw) |
NR | NR | NR | Time to return to sport (weeks): 8.0 (8–12) (open osteosuture), 21.0 (12–36.3) (arthroscopic screw) |
(Kieser et al., 2011) [23] | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
(Kim et al., 2007) [24] | NR | NR | NR | 96.3 (92.6–99.0) | NR | NR |
(Kristinsson et al., 2021) [25] | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | KOOS Scores:
EQ5D-5L VAS–92.0 (50–100) |
(Liljeros et al., 2009) [26] | NR | NR | NR | 93.69 | Activity Level (1–3): 2 (1–3) | Activity Level (1–3): 2 (1–3) |
(Marie-Laure et al., 2008) [27] | NR | NR | NR | 99.7 (95–100) | NR | NR |
(Memisoglu et al., 2016) [28] | NR | Objective: Grade A (7), Grade B (4) Subjective: 94.3 (85–100) |
NR | 95.7 ± 6.6 | NR | NR |
(Momaya et al., 2017) [29] | NR | Objective: NR Subjective: 97.3 ± 3.5 |
NR | 95.6 ± 5.2 | NR | NR |
(Najdi et al., 2016) [30] | NR | NR | NR | 99.1 ± 1.9 | NR | NR |
(Perugia et al., 2009) [31] | NR | Objective: Grade A (3), Grade B (4), Grade C (3) Subjective: 92.4 ± 3.3 |
NR | 95.9 ± 2.9 | NR | NR |
(Russu et al., 2021) [32] | Objective: NR Subjective: 33.4 ± 23.3 |
Objective: NR Subjective: 84.2 ± 14.3 |
53.7 ± 17.3 | 87.7 ± 9.9 | Tegner Score: 3.8 ± 1.1 |
Tegner Score: 6.7 ± 2.2 |
(Scrimshire et al., 2018) [33] | NR | NR | NR | Operative: 94 (washer used = 92, no washer used = 96) Non-operative: 95 |
NR | Cincinnati Score: Operative: 96 Non-operative: 96 |
(Sharma et al., 2008) [34] | NR | NR | NR | Screw and wire (non-absorbable): 89 (69–100) Suture (absorbable): 100 (85–100) |
NR | NR |
(Shimberg et al., 2022) [35] | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
(Shin et al., 2018) [36] | NR | NR | NR | 94.8 ± 6.8 | NR | NR |
(Sinha et al., 2017) [37] | NR | NR | 50.8 ± 1.4 | 96.3 ± 2.9 | NR | NR |
(Tudisco et al., 2010) [38] | NR | Objective: Grade A (2), Grade B (11), Grade C (1) Subjective: NR |
NR | NR | NR | NR |
(Uboldi et al., 2022) [39] | NR | Objective: Grade A (18), Grade B (19) Subjective: 88.45 (80–95) |
NR | NR | Tegner Activity Scale: 5.51 (3–7) |
Tegner Activity Scale: 5.61 (4–7) |
(Vega et al., 2008) [40] | NR | Objective: Grade A (4), Grade B (3) Subjective: 92 (86–98) |
29 | 94 | NR | NR |
(Watts et al., 2016) [41] | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
(Wiegand et al., 2014) [42] | NR | NR | NR | Conservative (Type I): 97.00 Arthroscopic (Type II): 94.97 Arthroscopic (Type III): 94.20 |
NR | NR |
(Wiktor and Tomaszewski, 2022) [43] | NR | Objective: NR Subjective: 84.64 ± 3.10 |
NR | 96.64 ± 4.54 | NR | NR |
(Wouters et al., 2010) [44] | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
(Xu et al., 2017) [45] | Objective: Grade C (15), Grade D (5) Subjective: NR |
Objective: Grade A (13), Grade B (7) Subjective: NR |
57.5 ± 11.2 | 91.0 ± 7.2 | Tegner Score: 4.6 ± 1.4 | Tegner Score: 8.0 ± 1.7 |
(Zhang et al., 2020) [46] | Objective: NR Subjective: 43.1 ± 13.2 |
Objective: NR Subjective: 83.8 ± 6.3 |
48.3 ± 6.21 | 87.1 ± 9.8 | NR | NR |
(Zheng et al., 2021) [47] | NR | Objective: NR Subjective: Group 1: 92.06 ± 3.55 Group 2: 86.07 ± 5.81 |
NR | Group 1: 93.33 ± 3.55 Group 2: 86.20 ± 4.52 |
NR | Tegner Score: Group 1: 7.75 ± 0.87 Group 2: 6.40 ± 0.52 |
(Zhou et al., 2023) [48] | Objective: NR Subjective: Group 1: 46.16 ± 12.57 Group 2: 47.27 ± 11.87 |
Objective: NR Subjective: Group 1: 90.15 ± 8.12 Group 2: 92.14 ± 7.89 |
Group 1: 43.23 ± 9.54 Group 2: 41.62 ± 10.15 |
Group 1: 91.08 ± 7.65 Group 2: 92.54 ± 9.17 |
Tegner Score: Group 1: 3.26 ± 1.54 Group 2: 3.02 ± 1.34 VAS Score: Group 1: 4.86 ± 0.53 Group 2: 5.13 ± 0.71 |
Tegner Score: Group 1: 5.76 ± 1.12 Group 2: 5.52 ± 1.01 VAS Score: Group 1: 1.23 ± 0.41 Group 2: 1.31 ± 0.51 |