Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 14;11(3):345. doi: 10.3390/children11030345

Table 5.

Study Outcomes. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Association pour la Recherche et la Promotion de l’Étude du Genou (ARPEGE), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Quality of Life (QOL). NR = Not Reported.

(Author, Year of Publication) Pre-Surgery IKDC Score Post-Surgery IKDC Score Pre-Surgery Lysholm Score Post-Surgery Lysholm Score Other Outcomes
Pre-Surgery Post-Surgery
(Abdelkafy and Said, 2014) [11] Objective: Grade B (1), Grade C (10), Grade D (2)
Subjective: 15.4 ± 4.2
Objective: Grade A (12), Grade B (1)
Subjective: 80.5 ± 16.7
3.8 ± 2.5 91.2 ± 8.9 VAS: 8.5 ± 1.2 (pain) VAS: 9.6 ± 0.5 (operation satisfaction), 0.4 ± 0.5 (pain)
(Brunner et al., 2016) [12] NR Objective Group A: Grade A (10), Grade B (5)
Objective Group B: Grade A (7), Grade B (3)
Subjective: NA
NR Group A: 94.1 ± 8.1
Group B: 90.1 ± 10.2
NR Rollimeter difference to ipsilateral knee (mm):
Group A: 0.5 ± 0.8
Group B: 0.5 ± 0.7
(Caglar et al., 2021) [13] NR Objective: NR
Subjective: 6 months: 82.3 (68–91); 12 months: 91.4 (81–100); 24 months: 95.7 (89–100)
NR NR NR NR
(Callanan et al., 2019) [14] NR NR NR NR NR Time to radiographic union: 2.1 years (suture); 4.3 years (screw)
(Casalonga et al., 2010) [15] NR Objective: Grade A (4), Grade B (4), Grade C (4), Grade D (1)
Subjective: 91 (mailed, n = 10), 81 (at follow-up, n = 13)
NR NR NR ARPEGE Score: 8.3
(Chalopin et al., 2022) [16] NR Objective: Grade A (14), Grade B (3)
Subjective: 97 ± 2.46
NR 99.1 ± 1.62 NR NR
(Chotel et al., 2016) [17] NR Objective: Grade A (9), Grade B (3), Grade C (1)
Subjective: 97 (91–100)
NR 97.36 (94–100) NR NR
(D’ambrosio et al., 2022) [18] NR Objective: NR
Subjective: 93.8 ± 6.4
NR 93.1 ± 9.8 NR Average return to sport time: 9.1 ± 9.5 months
Average Tegner Score: 5.6 ± 1.5
(Edmonds et al., 2015) [19] NR NR NR Arthroscopic: 95
Open: 97.4
Conservative: 86
NR Pain (0–10):
Arthroscopic: 0.2
Open: 0.7
Conservative: 2.7
(Furlan et al., 2010) [20] NR Objective: Grade A (8), Grade B (2)
Subjective: 96 (85–100)
NR NR NR NR
(Hirschmann et al., 2009) [21] NR Objective: Grade A (5), Grade B (1)
Subjective: 197 ± 4
NR 97 ± 3 Tegner Score: 8 (6–9) VAS: 0.5 ± 0.8 (pain), 9.5 ± 1.5 (satisfaction)
Tegner Score: 8 (6–9)
(Jaaskela et al., 2023) [22] NR Objective: NR
Subjective: 93.1 ± 13.5 (open osteosuture), 90.4 ± 14.5 (arthroscopic screw)
NR NR NR Time to return to sport (weeks): 8.0 (8–12) (open osteosuture), 21.0 (12–36.3) (arthroscopic screw)
(Kieser et al., 2011) [23] NR NR NR NR NR NR
(Kim et al., 2007) [24] NR NR NR 96.3 (92.6–99.0) NR NR
(Kristinsson et al., 2021) [25] NR NR NR NR NR KOOS Scores:
  • (1)

    Pain: 100 (19–100)

  • (2)

    Symptoms: 91.0 (54–100)

  • (3)

    ADL: 100 (22–100)

  • (4)

    Sport: 90.0 (0–100)

  • (5)

    QOL: 88.0 (13–100)

EQ5D-5L index value: 1.0 (0.225–1)
EQ5D-5L VAS–92.0 (50–100)
(Liljeros et al., 2009) [26] NR NR NR 93.69 Activity Level (1–3): 2 (1–3) Activity Level (1–3): 2 (1–3)
(Marie-Laure et al., 2008) [27] NR NR NR 99.7 (95–100) NR NR
(Memisoglu et al., 2016) [28] NR Objective: Grade A (7), Grade B (4)
Subjective: 94.3 (85–100)
NR 95.7 ± 6.6 NR NR
(Momaya et al., 2017) [29] NR Objective: NR
Subjective: 97.3 ± 3.5
NR 95.6 ± 5.2 NR NR
(Najdi et al., 2016) [30] NR NR NR 99.1 ± 1.9 NR NR
(Perugia et al., 2009) [31] NR Objective: Grade A (3), Grade B (4), Grade C (3)
Subjective: 92.4 ± 3.3
NR 95.9 ± 2.9 NR NR
(Russu et al., 2021) [32] Objective: NR
Subjective: 33.4 ± 23.3
Objective: NR
Subjective: 84.2 ± 14.3
53.7 ± 17.3 87.7 ± 9.9 Tegner Score:
3.8 ± 1.1
Tegner Score:
6.7 ± 2.2
(Scrimshire et al., 2018) [33] NR NR NR Operative: 94 (washer used = 92, no washer used = 96)
Non-operative: 95
NR Cincinnati Score:
Operative: 96
Non-operative: 96
(Sharma et al., 2008) [34] NR NR NR Screw and wire (non-absorbable): 89 (69–100)
Suture (absorbable): 100 (85–100)
NR NR
(Shimberg et al., 2022) [35] NR NR NR NR NR NR
(Shin et al., 2018) [36] NR NR NR 94.8 ± 6.8 NR NR
(Sinha et al., 2017) [37] NR NR 50.8 ± 1.4 96.3 ± 2.9 NR NR
(Tudisco et al., 2010) [38] NR Objective: Grade A (2), Grade B (11), Grade C (1)
Subjective: NR
NR NR NR NR
(Uboldi et al., 2022) [39] NR Objective: Grade A (18), Grade B (19)
Subjective: 88.45 (80–95)
NR NR Tegner Activity Scale:
5.51 (3–7)
Tegner Activity Scale: 5.61 (4–7)
(Vega et al., 2008) [40] NR Objective: Grade A (4), Grade B (3)
Subjective: 92 (86–98)
29 94 NR NR
(Watts et al., 2016) [41] NR NR NR NR NR NR
(Wiegand et al., 2014) [42] NR NR NR Conservative (Type I): 97.00
Arthroscopic (Type II): 94.97
Arthroscopic (Type III): 94.20
NR NR
(Wiktor and Tomaszewski, 2022) [43] NR Objective: NR
Subjective: 84.64 ± 3.10
NR 96.64 ± 4.54 NR NR
(Wouters et al., 2010) [44] NR NR NR NR NR NR
(Xu et al., 2017) [45] Objective: Grade C (15), Grade D (5)
Subjective: NR
Objective: Grade A (13), Grade B (7)
Subjective: NR
57.5 ± 11.2 91.0 ± 7.2 Tegner Score: 4.6 ± 1.4 Tegner Score: 8.0 ± 1.7
(Zhang et al., 2020) [46] Objective: NR
Subjective: 43.1 ± 13.2
Objective: NR
Subjective: 83.8 ± 6.3
48.3 ± 6.21 87.1 ± 9.8 NR NR
(Zheng et al., 2021) [47] NR Objective: NR
Subjective: Group 1: 92.06 ± 3.55
Group 2: 86.07 ± 5.81
NR Group 1: 93.33 ± 3.55
Group 2: 86.20 ± 4.52
NR Tegner Score:
Group 1: 7.75 ± 0.87
Group 2: 6.40 ± 0.52
(Zhou et al., 2023) [48] Objective: NR
Subjective: Group 1: 46.16 ± 12.57
Group 2: 47.27 ± 11.87
Objective: NR Subjective: Group 1: 90.15 ± 8.12
Group 2: 92.14 ± 7.89
Group 1: 43.23 ± 9.54
Group 2: 41.62 ± 10.15
Group 1: 91.08 ± 7.65
Group 2: 92.54 ± 9.17
Tegner Score:
Group 1: 3.26 ± 1.54
Group 2: 3.02 ± 1.34

VAS Score:
Group 1: 4.86 ± 0.53
Group 2: 5.13 ± 0.71
Tegner Score: Group 1: 5.76 ± 1.12
Group 2: 5.52 ± 1.01

VAS Score:
Group 1: 1.23 ± 0.41
Group 2: 1.31 ± 0.51