Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Oct 11.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023 Oct 2;15(40):46626–46638. doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c08734

Table 4.

Antimicrobial Activity of WG-1 against Pathogen Challenges Determined by Shake Flask and Biofilm Tests

shake flask test biofilm test
pathogen/Gram (±)e percent infectionsb (%) log reductiona,c % kill log reductionc % reduction
E. coli (G−) K-12 23.90 4.3B >99.99 d
E. coli (G−) uropathogenic 23.90 >5B >99.999 3.2 99.93
C. albicans 17.80 >4B >99.99 3.4 99.9
E. faecalis (G+, E) 11 >5B >99.999 d
P. aeruginosa (G–, E) 10.3 0.8B ~80 1.4 95.9
K. pneumoniae (G–, E) 10.1 5B 99.999 2.9 99.9
S. aureus (G+, E) 1.6 0.9M9 ~90 2.3 99.5
a

Superscripts indicate the test medium, both at pH ~7; B = PB; M9 = M9 medium.

b

Percent pathogens for UTIs vary in reviews. Those listed are from Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiology, 2016, 37, 1288–130 and Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015, 13, 269–284.

c

Log reduction for C14–3 is based on growth for untreated Bardex all-silicone.

d

Not determined.

e

“ESKAPE” pathogens are designated “E” (see text).