Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 15;31(5):629–639. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad380

Table 2.

Relative effect of an intensive lifestyle intervention on left atrium structural and functional parameters

Control group ILI group Difference ILI vs. control
Y3 vs. baseline Y5 vs. baseline Y3 vs. baseline Y5 vs. baseline Y3 vs. baseline Y5 vs. baseline
LA emptying fraction 0.96 (0.94–0.99) 0.95 (0.93–0.98) 0.96 (0.93–0.98) 0.97 (0.94–1.00) 1.00 (0.96–1.03) 1.01 (0.97–1.05)
LA longitudinal strain 0.88 (0.85–0.92) 0.82 (0.79–0.85) 0.91 (0.88–0.95) 0.85 (0.82–0.89) 1.04 (0.98–1.09) 1.04 (0.98–1.10)
Indexed LA volume 1.07 (1.03–1.11) 1.19 (1.15–1.23) 1.09 (1.05–1.13) 1.18 (1.14–1.23) 1.02 (0.97–1.07) 0.99 (0.94–1.05)
LA maximum volume 1.07 (1.03–1.11) 1.19 (1.14–1.23) 1.07 (1.03–1.11) 1.16 (1.12–1.20) 1.00 (0.95–1.05) 0.98 (0.93–1.03)
LA conduit strain 0.88 (0.82–0.93) 0.84 (0.79–0.89) 0.91 (0.86–0.97) 0.82 (0.77–0.87) 1.04 (0.95–1.13) 0.98 (0.90–1.06)
LA pump strain 0.92 (0.87–0.97) 0.84 (0.79–0.89) 0.92 (0.87–0.97) 0.88 (0.83–0.93) 1.01 (0.93–1.09) 1.05 (0.97–1.13)
LA stiffness index 1.11 (1.05–1.17) 1.17 (1.11–1.23) 1.07 (1.02–1.13) 1.10 (1.04–1.16) 0.97 (0.90–1.04) 0.94 (0.87–1.02)
LA function index 0.89 (0.84–0.94) 0.82 (0.78–0.87) 0.88 (0.83–0.93) 0.82 (0.78–0.87) 0.99 (0.92–1.07) 1.00 (0.92–1.08)

Before using the mixed models, the variables were log-transformed. Later, they were back-transformed to enable easier interpretation. In this table, the values represent the ratios of geometric means, alongside their 95% CI. The models were adjusted for the recruitment centre.

LA, left atrial.