Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 22;53(5):935–945. doi: 10.1007/s00256-023-04515-0

Table 3.

Comparison of joint scores between different patient groups

RA Non-RA* HC p-value RA vs non-RA p-value RA vs HC p-value non-RA vs HC
Synovitis MRI scores 6 (1.5–9) 1.5 (0–3) 0 (0–1) 0.004 0.004 0.10
Erosion MRI scores 1 (0–3.75) 0 (0–1) 0 (0–0) 0.07 0.038 0.08
Swollen joint count 2.5 (1–4) 0 (0–0) NA < 0.001 N/A N/A
Tender joint count 6.5 (3–13.3) 3 (0.5–6) NA 0.13 N/A N/A
Bursitis 2 (0–2.75) 1 (0–1) 0 (0–0) 0.043 0.028 0.043
Enthesitis 1.5 (0–3.75) 1 (0–2.75) 0 (0–0) 0.99 0.031 0.010
Tenosynovitis 1 (0–1) 0 (0–0.5) 0 (0–0) 0.88 0.09 0.35

Columns 2–4 show median (interquartile range) of each group. Columns 5–7 show p-value of pairwise Mann-Whitney U-test between each set of groups with correction for multiple comparisons. Asterisk symbol indicates that two patients in the non-RA group had spine-only imaging, and so these have been removed for this analysis