Table 3.
Informant characteristics of CYP sample aged 11–15 years
| CYP Characteristics | CYP sample total | Associated parentsa |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | ||
| 11 | 4 | 4 |
| 12 | 7b | 6 |
| 13 | 2 | 1 |
| 14 | 4 | 4 |
| 15 | 2 | 1 |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 10 | 7 |
| Female | 9 | 9 |
| Ethnicity | ||
| White British | 13 | 12 |
| Black | 1 | 0 |
| Asian | 4 | 4 |
| Other | 1 | 0 |
| Deprivation levelc | ||
| 1–3 (most deprived) | 5 | 2 |
| 4–7 | 8 | 8 |
| 8–10 (least deprived) | 6 | 6 |
| Urban/Rural | ||
| Urban | 14 | 11 |
| Rural | 5 | 5 |
| Health condition | ||
| Health condition | 4 | 4 |
| No health condition | 15 | 12 |
| Family | ||
| One parent | 6 | 4 |
| Two parents | 13 | 12 |
aNumbers of associated parents in the final column exceed the total number of parents in the sample because some parents were interviewed about multiple CYP
bThis number includes the perspective of one secondary parent who acted as a proxy for her 12-year-old daughter due to her having severe learning difficulties and being unable to participate in the study directly
cDeprivation level determined using the English Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) measure, which ranks small areas in England from most deprived to least deprived in ten equal groups (with IMD decile 1 being most and decile 10 being least deprived)