Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 27;10:28. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00697-6

Table 3.

Erythrocyte membrane fatty acid composition and activity of enzymes involved in fatty acid metabolism in recruited male subjects, divided depending on hormone abuse

BBINS
(n = 15)
BBGH
(n = 12)
BBAAS
(n = 13)
BBNU
(n = 52)
CTRL
(n = 45)
One-way ANOVA Effect Size*
SATURATED FAs
Myristic 14:00 0.31 ± 0.03 0.30 ± 0.03 0.28 ± 0.02 0.33 ± 0.01 0.35 ± 0.02 0.06 -0.2 (-0.8–0.3)
Palmitic 16:00 23.18 ± 0.55c,d 23.18 ± 0.62c,d 21.49 ± 0.40a,b 20.79 ± 0.15a,b,e 22.15 ± 0.42d < 0.001 0.7 (0.18–1.3)
Stearic 18:00 16.33 ± 0.50d,e 16.15 ± 0.40c,d,e 17.31 ± 0.35b,e 18.01 ± 0.12a,b,e 19.31 ± 0.23a,b,c,d < 0.001 -1.2 (-1.7 - -0.6)
SUM 39.79 ± 0.41 e 39.60 ± 0.38e 39.05 ± 0.50e 39.13 ± 0.15e 41.82 ± 0.61a,b,c,d 0.001 -0.1 (-0.7–0.4)
MONOUNSATURATED FAs
Palmitoleic 16:1n-7 0.33 ± 0.06c,d,e 0.25 ± 0.05 0.19 ± 0.03a 0.21 ± 0.01a 0.23 ± 0.01a 0.01 1.0 (0.45–1.5)
Oleic 18:1n-9 13.90 ± 0.43 13.56 ± 0.42 12.95 ± 0.23 13.23 ± 0.16 13.68 ± 0.26 0.26 -
Eicosaenoic 20:1n-9 0.28 ± 0.02b,c,d,e 0.23 ± 0.02a 0.22 ± 0.02a 0.24 ± 0.01a 0.23 ± 0.01a 0.02 0.5 (0.001–1.0)
SUM** 15.77 ± 0.46 15.42 ± 0.49 14.62 ± 0.28 14.81 ± 0.16 15.37 ± 0.29 0.12 -
n-3 POLYUNSATURATED FAs
α-Linolenic 18:3n-3 0.13 ± 0.01e 0.11 ± 0.03e 0.11 ± 0.02e 0.12 ± 0.01e 0.30 ± 0.03a,b,c,d < 0.001 -0.5 (-1.0–0.08)
Eicosapentaenoic 20:5n-3 1.80 ± 0.38b,c,d,e 1.28 ± 0.29a,c,d,e 0.62 ± 0.16a,b 0.72 ± 0.04a,b,e 0.45 ± 0.03a,b,d < 0.001 1.692 (1.1–2.2)
Docosapentaenoic 22:5n-3 2.69 ± 0.18c,e 2.62 ± 0.17e 2.31 ± 0.13a,d 2.72 ± 0.04c,e 2.30 ± 0.07a,b,d < 0.001 0.3 (-0.2–0.9)
Docosahexaenoic 22:6n-3 5.30 ± 0.38e 5.03 ± 0.41 4.70 ± 0.43d 5.52 ± 0.16c,e 4.28 ± 0.20a,d < 0.001 0.3 (-0.3–0.8)
SUM 9.85 ± 0.80c,e 9.03 ± 0.79e 7.71 ± 0.62a,d 9.07 ± 0.21c,e 7.18 ± 0.27a,b,d < 0.001 0.7 (0.2–1.3)
ω-3 index 7.10 ± 0.67c,e 6.31 ± 0.66e 5.32 ± 0.55a 6.24 ± 0.19e 4.71 ± 0.22a,b,d < 0.001 0.9 (0.27–1.36)
n-6 POLYUNSATURATED FAs
Linoleic 18:2n-6 12.71 ± 0.59b,d 14.09 ± 0.83a,d,e 13.01 ± 0.66d,e 11.64 ± 0.20a,b,c 11.77 ± 0.19b,c < 0.001 0.3 (-0.2–0.9)
Eicosadienoic 20:2n-6 0.65 ± 0.23 0.43 ± 0.12 0.68 ± 0.23 0.50 ± 0.07 0.40 ± 0.03 0.34 -
Dihomo-γ-linolenic 20:3n-6 1.53 ± 0.15d 1.67 ± 0.17d 1.69 ± 0.14d 2.00 ± 0.08a,b,c,e 1.73 ± 0.06d 0.01 -0.5 (-1.1 - -0.03)
Arachidonic 20:4n-6 15.44 ± 0.57c,d 15.74 ± 0.46c,d 17.68 ± 0.32a,b 17.70 ± 0.26a,b 16.79 ± 0.45 < 0.01 -0.7 (-1.3 - -0.2)
Adrenic 22:4n-6 2.88 ± 0.26c,d,e 2.98 ± 0.32c,d,e 3.73 ± 0.23a,b 3.79 ± 0.09a,b 3.98 ± 0.15a,b < 0.001 -1.0 (-1.5 - -0.4)
Docosapentaenoic 22:5n-6 0.39 ± 0.04c,d,e 0.44 ± 0.05c,d,e 0.61 ± 0.06a,b,e 0.67 ± 0.03a,b 0.74 ± 0.03a,b,c < 0.001 -1.2 (-1.7 - -0.6)
SUM 33.64 ± 0.86c,d 35.38 ± 0.99 37.42 ± 0.67a 36.31 ± 0.31a 35.39 ± 0.67 0.03 -0.9 (-1.4 - -0.4)
ENZYME ACTIVITIES
Δ9 desaturase (16:1/16:0) 0.014 ± 0.002b,c,d,e 0.011 ± 0.002a 0.009 ± 0.001a 0.010 ± 0.001a 0.010 ± 0.000a 0.03 0.9 (0.3–1.4)
Δ5 desaturase (20:4n6/20:3n6) 11.66 ± 1.4 10.44 ± 1.1 11.46 ± 1.1 9.57 ± 0.4 10.2 ± 0.5 0.26 -
Elongase (18:0/16:0) 0.72 ± 0.04c,d,e 0.71 ± 0.04c,d,e 0.81 ± 0.02a,b,d,e 0.87 ± 0.01a,b,c 0.88 ± 0.01a,b,c < 0.001 -

Values are expressed as mean (%) ± SEM. BBINS, bodybuilders abusing insulin alone (n = 1) or in association with anabolic androgenic steroids (n = 3) or with anabolic androgenic steroids and growth hormone (n = 11); BBGH, bodybuilders abusing growth hormone alone (n = 1) or in association with anabolic androgenic steroids (n = 11); BBAAS, bodybuilders abusing only anabolic androgenic steroids; BBNU, bodybuilders not using hormones; CTRL, non-bodybuilders

Statistical analysis was performed by using One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc analysis. a, significant difference from BBINS (P < 0.05). b, significant difference from BBGH (P < 0.05). c, significant difference from BBAAS (P < 0.05). d, significant difference from BBNU (P < 0.05). e, significant difference from CTRL (P < 0.05)

*Effect size is calculated to quantify differences between BBINS group versus all the other groups. If post-hoc analysis showed a difference between BBINS and more than one group, both pooled average and standard deviation of these groups were considered to assess effect size. < 0.2 low probability; 0.2–0.8 medium probability; > 0.8 strong probability. Effect size is expressed as point estimate and confidence intervals (95%)

**The monounsaturated sum had been calculated including elaidic acid content (not reported in table)

Δ9 desaturase activity was estimated as as palmitoleic-to-palmitic acid ratio. Δ5 desaturase activity was estimated as arachidonic-to-dihomo-γ-linolenic ratio acid ratio. Elongase activity was estimated as stearic-to-palmitic ratio