Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 18;75:103714. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103714

Table 3.

Summary of results showing barriers and facilitators for shorter time to diagnosis of breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries.

Study No. Lead Author Delayed Pre-contact Interval (days) Delayed Post-contact Interval (days) Barriers to early diagnosisa Facilitators of early diagnosisa
1 Amornsak P et al. [15] >90b >90b
  • -

    Previous breast symptoms

  • -

    Self-treatment

  • -

    Longer distance from home to hospital (>5 km)

  • -

    Longer travel time (>60 min)

  • -

    Advanced stage

  • -

    Early pregnancy (<20yrs)

  • -

    Greater number of consultations before diagnosis (>2)

2c Foerster M et al. [19]
  • -

    Older age (every 10 yrs older increases delay)

  • -

    Low socioeconomic position

  • -

    Illiterate or primary education only

  • -

    Belief in traditional Medicine

  • -

    HIV Positive

  • -

    Heard about BC

  • -

    Think BC is common

3 Medeiros GC et al. [26] >90
  • -

    Diagnosis/breast biopsy in public health service

  • -

    Shorter interval to gynaecological consultation (<3years)

  • -

    Breast lump as first sign

4 Pace LE et al. [29] >180b >180b
  • -

    Illiterate or primary education only

  • -

    First consultation with traditional healer

  • -

    Visit of health facilities ≥5 times before diagnosis

  • -

    Place of residenced

5c Togawa K et al. [30] >90b >90b
  • -

    Rural residence

  • -

    Greater travel distance (every 50 km more increases delay)

6 Unger-Saldana K et al. [31]
  • -

    Being single

  • -

    Interpret symptoms as not worrisome.

  • -

    Concealed symptoms

  • -

    Lack of financial resources

  • -

    Difficulty missing a day at work.

  • -

    Visited other health services than cancer hospital

  • -

    Perceived medical errors

14 Dos Santos Andrade LS et al. [16] >90
  • -

    Public health facility for diagnosis

  • -

    Integrated health services

  • -

    Privately financed

  • -

    Support from NGO.

15 Frie KG et al. [20]
  • -

    Lack of knowledge of breast-self-examination

  • -

    Interpretation of first symptom as not serious

  • -

    Being employed

  • -

    Being married

  • -

    Younger age

16 Hewage S et al. [21]
  • -

    First consultation with Ayurvedic doctor

  • -

    Initial presentation being to a specialist

17 Hewage SA et al. [22] >15b >30b
  • -

    Lower family income

  • -

    Socioeconomically disadvantaged

  • -

    Poor emotional support

  • -

    Negative perception towards accessibility of health services

  • -

    Lack of knowledge about BC

  • -

    Multiple visits to the healthcare provider

  • -

    Initial presentation being to a specialist (Surgeon or Oncologist)

18e Imran M et al. [24]
  • -

    Being married

  • -

    Being employed

19 Mohd Mujar NM et al. [28] >90b >30b
  • -

    Complementary and alternative medicine use

  • -

    Symptomatic breast lump

20 Daniel O et al. [34]
  • -

    Residence outside central Kenya

  • -

    Never married/without partner

  • -

    Women with three children or more

21f Hanafi I et al. [35] >90b >90b
  • -

    Lack of accessibility of healthcare (smaller cities/rural residence, Insufficient income, lower education, armed conflict had direct relation with lack of accessibility)

NGO: Non-governmental organization; BC: Breast Cancer.

a

Only the factors which are significant in multivariable analysis were included.

b

Time given in weeks/months converted to days.

c

Factors for total diagnosis time (from symptoms to diagnosis).

d

Residence compared to study area and other.

e

Factors for total time to treatment (symptom recognition to treatment).

f

Factors influencing any interval more than 90 days.