Table 8.
Evidentiary basis for strong recommendation favoring varenicline over nicotine patch in patients with mental disorders, with high-certainty evidence
Certainty assessment |
Summary of findings |
Certainty | Importance | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. of samples (studies) | Risk of bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Publication bias | No (%) or % |
Relative effect (95% CI) | Absolute (per 1,000 patients) |
|||||
Varenicline | Nicotine patch | Varenicline | Nicotine patch | ||||||||||
Tobacco abstinence at 6 mo | 6,132 (6 RCTs) | Not serious | Not serious | Not serious | Not serious | Not serious | 1,104/6,131 (18) | 12.9 | RR 1.38 (1.27 to 1.50) | 49 more ↑35–↑65) | 129 | High | Critical |
Serious adverse events | 6,531 (5 RCTs) | Not serious | Not serious* | Not serious | Not serious† | Not serious | 1,174/6,531 (18) | 12.1 | RR 1.07 (1.00 to 1.15) | 8 more (0–↑18) | 121 | High | Critical |
RR, risk ratio; CI, confidence interval; RCT, randomized controlled trials.
Heterogeneity (I2)=88%, but it was evaluated that there is no need to lower the level of evidence due to the same direction of the effects.
The CI contains 1.00, but between 0.75 and 1.25, so the evidence level was not lowered due to imprecision.