Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Chem. 2023 Aug 31;15(10):1391–1399. doi: 10.1038/s41557-023-01312-z

Table 1 |.

Reaction discovery and optimization.

graphic file with name nihms-1974543-t0007.jpg

Entry Variations from the “standard conditions” Yield of 4a (%)a Yield of 4a’ (%)a

1 none 74 (68b) 15
2 other electrophile instead of 2a listed below listed below
3 No Pd 0 0
4 Pd(OAc)2 instead of PdCl2 45 11
5 No L1 14 <5
6 PPh3 instead of L1 65 16
7 P(2-pyr)3 instead of L1 26 8
8 No N1 0 77
9 simple NBE (N2) instead of N1 5 6
10 N1 (100 mol%) 61 17
11 N1 (50 mol%) 46 23
12 No pyridine 28 24
graphic file with name nihms-1974543-t0008.jpg graphic file with name nihms-1974543-t0009.jpg graphic file with name nihms-1974543-t0010.jpg
graphic file with name nihms-1974543-t0011.jpg graphic file with name nihms-1974543-t0012.jpg graphic file with name nihms-1974543-t0013.jpg graphic file with name nihms-1974543-t0014.jpg

Reaction conditions: 1a (0.10 mmol), 2a (0.15 mmol), 3a (0.11 mmol), PdCl2 (0.01 mmol), ligand (0.02 mmol), NBE (0.15 mmol), pyridine (1.0 mmol), Cs2CO3 (0.25 mmol), 1,4-dioxane (1.0 mL), 100 °C, 24 h.

a

Yield was determined by 1H NMR using dibromomethane as the internal standard.

b

Isolated yield.