Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 13;16(6):815. doi: 10.3390/nu16060815

Table 3.

Measurement of body composition and blood parameters.

Group Baseline Week 16 p Value (vs. Baseline) c
Mean ± SEM Mean ± SEM
CT measurement
Total fat area (cm2) a Placebo (n = 44) 315.68 ± 11.71 320.95 ± 11.04 0.115
Probiotics (n = 45) 316.61 ± 10.43 312.42 ± 10.87 0.233
p value b 0.049
Visceral fat area (cm2) a Placebo (n = 44) 112.77 ± 5.52 115.69 ± 5.70 0.199
Probiotics (n = 45) 115.32 ± 5.35 111.50 ± 5.31 0.068
p value b 0.031
Subcutaneous fat area (cm2) a Placebo (n = 44) 202.91 ± 10.33 205.26 ± 10.09 0.280
Probiotics (n = 45) 201.28 ± 8.67 200.91 ± 9.17 0.864
p value b 0.373
Bioelectrical impedance analysis
Body fat mass (kg) Placebo (n = 47) 22.45 ± 0.68 23.32 ± 0.64 <0.001
Probiotics (n = 47) 22.54 ± 0.74 22.86 ± 0.79 0.272
p value b 0.107
Body fat percentage (%) Placebo (n = 47) 30.64 ± 1.00 31.45 ± 0.92 <0.001
Probiotics (n = 47) 30.83 ± 1.05 31.10 ± 1.08 0.401
p value b 0.158
Other parameters
Body weight (kg) Placebo (n = 47) 73.74 ± 1.12 74.64 ± 1.14 <0.001
Probiotics (n = 47) 73.55 ± 1.10 73.82 ± 1.13 0.244
p value b 0.056
BMI (kg/m2) Placebo (n = 47) 26.02 ± 0.27 26.35 ± 0.27 <0.001
Probiotics (n = 47) 26.20 ± 0.26 26.28 ± 0.27 0.319
p value b 0.046
Triglycerides (mg/dL) Placebo (n = 47) 120.49 ± 7.84 127.57 ± 10.44 0.342
Probiotics (n = 47) 130.87 ± 11.78 108.98 ± 7.29 0.028
p value b 0.021

a: Three participants in the placebo group and two participants in the probiotics group were excluded due to missing CT data. b: p values determined by ANCOVA adjusted for the baseline. c: p values determined by a paired t test.