Table 2.
Summary of the reviewed hydrodynamic modeling methods
| Method | Model generalization | Advantage | Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| EF [64] | Bad | Simple and fast | Invalid for complex models |
| RT [65] | Bad | High-quality data available | Complex data interpretation |
| NSA [66,67] | Good | 1. High flexibility | Model uncertainties |
| 2. Cost-effective | |||
| MPI [68,69] | Good | 1. High model reliability | 1. Difficult to collect valid data |
| 2. Learning ability | 2. Risk of over-fitting |
EF, Empirical Formula; RT, Restraint Test; NSA, Numerical Simulation Analysis; MPI, Motion Parameter Identification.