Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 28;25:244. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07365-6

Table 2.

Comparison of static balance with eyes open among four taping conditions (Mean values ± SD).

Intervention ML COP sway range (mm) AP COP sway range (mm) ML COP velocity(mm/s) AP COP
velocity (mm/s)
Total sway area (mm2) Total sway length(mm)
NT 5.84 ± 4.72 7.47 ± 5.40 34.61 ± 21.73 34.44 ± 26.79 2105.29 ± 772.88 1383.18 ± 180.97
ST 5.00 ± 2.29 4.75 ± 2.65 32.40 ± 5.85 36.30 ± 5.06 1925.95 ± 319.80 1224.85 ± 198.61
AT 5.72 ± 2.27 5.00 ± 2.11 26.22 ± 5.23 24.27 ± 6.34 901.06 ± 427.89* 886.39 ± 246.24*
KT 5.26 ± 1.97 4.16 ± 1.86* 28.47 ± 6.80 27.52 ± 4.59 1248.80 ± 521.76* 1169.03 ± 264.58*
F values 0.327 3.714 1.878 3.121 20.771 18.880
P values 0.806 0.015 0.141 0.031 0.001 0.001
η2 0.013 0.134 0.07 0.116 0.470 0.447

Note: COP = center of pressure; ML = mediolateral;AP = anteroposterior.

*Indicates a difference compared with NT (p<0.05);

Indicates a difference compared with ST (p<0.05);

Indicates a difference compared with AT (p<0.05).