. 2024 Mar 28;24:297. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04884-8

Table 3.

Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values for RMA and its components. TP– true positive; FP– false positive; TN– true negative; FN– false negative; CI– confidence interval; Sens.- Sensitivity; Spec.- Specificity; NPV– negative predictive value; PPV– positive predictive value. N = 384; 4AT positive = 98; 4AT negative = 286

	TP (n)	FP (n)	TN (n)	FN (n)	Sens. % (95% CI)	Spec. % (95% CI)	NPV % (95% CI)	PPV % (95% CI)
RADAR	94	104	182	4	95.8 92.0, 99.8))	63.6 58.1, 69.2))	97.8 95.8, 99.9))	47.5 (40.5, 54.4)
RADAR + MOYB	92	80	206	6	93.9 (89.1, 98.6)	72.0 (66.8, 77.2)	97.2 (94.9, 99.4)	53.5 (46.0, 60.9)
RMA	92	5	281	6	93.9 (89.1, 98.6)	98.3 (96.7, 99.8)	97.9 (96.3, 99.6)	94.8 (90.4, 99.2)

TP
(n)

FP
(n)

TN
(n)

FN
(n)

Sens. %
(95% CI)

Spec. %
(95% CI)

NPV %
(95% CI)

PPV %
(95% CI)

RADAR

104

182

95.8

92.0, 99.8))

63.6

58.1, 69.2))

97.8

95.8, 99.9))

47.5

(40.5, 54.4)

RADAR + MOYB

206

93.9

(89.1, 98.6)

72.0

(66.8, 77.2)

97.2

(94.9, 99.4)

53.5

(46.0, 60.9)

RMA

281

93.9

(89.1, 98.6)

98.3

(96.7, 99.8)

97.9

(96.3, 99.6)

94.8

(90.4, 99.2)