Table 3.

Quantitative comparisons with previous state-of-the-art approaches on validation and test sets. Data are present as mean (standard deviation) (n = 5)

Methods	Validation set				Test set
	DSC (%)	HD (mm)	ASSD (mm)		DSC (%)	HD (mm)	ASSD (mm)
AffinityNet	72.7 (2.45) **	69.1 (4.68) **	21.6 (1.81) **		73.5 (1.47) *	58.1 (0.43) **	20.4 (1.46) **
SEAM	75.2 (2.30) **	52.8 (0.97) **	16.9 (2.86) **		75.6 (4.56) *	56.7 (0.60) **	17.6 (5.10) **
Puzzle-CAM	76.8 (4.09) *	49.7 (1.54) **	13.6 (0.94) *		77.0 (0.93) *	41.5 (2.48) **	15.6 (5.04) *
ReCAM	78.8 (3.56)	45.5 (3.16) **	12.2 (2.82)		78.2 (2.42)	43.9 (3.18) **	12.1 (1.47)
L2G	81.0 (6.17)	37.4 (2.69)	11.1 (0.65)		81.1 (3.47)	36.3 (2.29) **	9.62 (8.51)
Ours	82.8 (0.96)	34.7 (2.14)	10.5 (2.56)		83.5 (5.33)	29.3 (3.26)	8.83 (4.21)

^*represents a significant difference between the previous and proposed methods (p-value < 0.05); ^**represents a very significant difference between the previous and proposed methods (p-value < 0.01)