Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 20;2024:1424404. doi: 10.1155/2024/1424404

Table 4.

Comparison of PS, ADAM17, TNF-α, and sMER based on WC ranges.

Variables Group a b c d e
Control (n = 29) Obese 1 (WC 91–110 cm) (n = 17) Obese 2 (WC 110–120 cm) (n = 22) Obese 3 (WC > 120 cm) (n = 17)
PS (ng/mL) 153.2 ± 15.6 135.4 ± 18.0 170.4 ± 16.9 285.0 ± 34.9 0.240 0.749 0.003 0.147 0.014
ADAM17 (kg/m2) 143.2 ± 59.8 400.9 ± 142.3 643.1 ± 198.7 2700.1 ± 679.4 0.011 <0.001 <0.001 0.404 0.015
TNF-α (pg/mL) 1.2 ± 0.1 1.2 ± 0.9 1.1 ± 0.8 1.6 ± 0.2 0.216 0.159 0.083 0.863 0.009
sMER (pg/mL) 546.2 ± 163.1 514.6 ± 82.9 406.3 ± 45.2 967.6 ± 272.8 0.825 0.825 0.026 0.343 0.007

All results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Obese 1, waist circumference 91–110 cm; obese 2, waist circumference 110–120 cm; obese 3, waist circumference >120 cm; acomparison of confidence interval between the control group and obese 1 group; bcomparison of confidence interval between the control group and obese 2 group; ccomparison of confidence interval between the control group and obese 3 group; dcomparison of confidence interval between the obese 1 and obese 2 groups; ecomparison of confidence interval between the obese 2 and obese 3 groups. Significant in the 95% confidence interval (p < 0.05) using the Mann–Whitney test.