Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 29;103(13):e37593. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037593

Table 5.

Efficiency and safety evaluation of included SR/meta-analysis.

Index Study Effect 95% CI P Note
The overall clinical efficacy rate Tang, R 2017[19] 2.85 1.75, 4.63 <.001
Yu, F 2018[20] 1.22 1.17, 1.28 <.00001 Control: blank control, merger effect
1.25 1.13, 1.38 <.0001 Control: blank control within 48 hours of cerebral infarction
1.21 1.15, 1.27 <.00001 Control: blank control after 48 hours of cerebral infarction
1.21 1.10, 1.32 <.0001 Control: Citicoline
0.75 0.67, 0.84 <.00001 Control: Edaravone (prevailing side)
NIHSS score Wang, Z 2017[16] 1.03 0.83, 1.28 .77
Bornstein, NM 2017[17] 0.60 0.56, 0.64 <.0001
0.54 0.49, 0.59 .10 z
0.64 0.57, 0.72 .0001 Early changes of NIHSS in patients with moderate to severe stroke
Guekht, A 2017[18] 0.59 0.53, 0.64 .0016 Baseline change in the NIHSS on the 14th day
0.59 0.54, 0.64 .001 Baseline change in the NIHSS on the 21st day
Tang, R 2017[19] −1.77 −2.33, −1.21 <.001
Yu, F 2018[20] −2.21 −3.56, −0.85
MESSS score Yu, F 2018[20] −4.44 −6.55, −2.34
ARAT score Guekht, A 2017[18] 0.62 0.57, 0.68 <.0001 All randomized patients
0.61 0.54, 0.68 .0015 ARAT baseline score > 0
BI score Wang, Z 2017[16] 0.96 0.84, 1.08 .44
Zhang, D 2017[15] 6.80 −0.55, 14.16 .07
Tang, R 2017[19] 7.30 3.48, 11.13 <.001
Yu, F 2018[20] 4.34 3.15, 5.53
mRS score Bornstein, NM 2017[17] 0.61 0.52, 0.69 .01
Wang, Z 2017[16] 1.33 0.79, 2.24 .28
Zhang, D 2017[15] 1.32 0.88, 1.99 .18 Two-category data analysis
−0.49 −1.21, 0.24 .19 Continuous data analysis
Whole blood viscosity Yu, F 2018[20] −0.66 −0.89, −0.43 <.00001 High shear rate
−1.28 −1.86, −0.69 <.0001 Low shear rate
Fibrinogen content Yu, F 2018[20] −0.75 −1.19, −0.31 .0009
Plasma viscosity Yu, F 2018[20] −0.27 −0.74, −0.20 .26
Mortality rate Zhang, D 2017[15] 0.82 0.55, 1.22 .33
Wang, Z 2017[16] 0.86 0.57, 1.31 .49
Bornstein, NM 2017[17] 0.81 0.50, 1.31 .49
Ziganshina, LE 2020[21] 0.90 0.61, 1.32 .58
Strilciuc, S 2021[22] 0.83 0.57, 1.23 .36
Tang, R 2017[19] 0.79 0.52, 1.19 .25
Adverse reactions/adverse events Zhang, D 2017[15] 0.98 0.90, 1.08 .75
Wang, Z 2017[16] 0.98 0.88, 1.09 .67
Bornstein, N. M 2017[17] 1.02 0.83, 1.26 .84 Fixed effect model
0.99 0.70, 1.38 .94 Random effect model
Ziganshina, L. E 2020[21] 0.97 0.85, 1.10 .62
Strilciuc, S 2021[22] 0.98 0.88, 1.09 .73
Tang R 2017[19] 1.04 0.85, 1.27 .72
Men P 2016[28] 1.37 0.95, 1.97 >.05
Serious adverse reactions/serious adverse events Zhang, D 2017[15] 1.18 0.85, 1.64 .31
Wang, Z 2017[16] 1.20 0.86, 1.66 .29
Bornstein, NM 2017[17] 1.08 0.73, 1.59 .70
Ziganshina, LE 2020[21] 1.15 0.81, 1.65 .44
2.15 1.01, 4.55 .047 Non-fatal serious adverse event
0.90 0.59, 1.38 .63 Fatal, serious adverse event
Strilciuc, S 2021[22] 0.99 0.74, 1.32 .95
Tang, R 2017[19] 0.01 −0.02, 0.04 .51
Men P 2016[28] 0.96 0.83, 1.11 >.05
Strilciuc, S 2021[22] 1.18 0.75, 1.86 .46
Disability rate Tang R 2017[19] 0.46 0.2, 1.03 .06
Non-fatal loss Ziganshina, L. E 2020[21] 0.97 0.45, 2.06 .93