Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 1;31(1):65–88. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02332-z

Table 2.

Frequent claims about properties of a direct measure M, the assumptions about the criterion content CM implied by those claims, and possible counterarguments against those claims

Claim: Assumptions about criterion content implied by the claim: Test to counter the claim:
"M is a valid measure of awareness" Weak assumption: qcCM Difficult to counter even for obviously misspecified tasks
"M is an exclusive measure of awareness" Strong assumption: CM = {qc} Show that M is sensitive to parameters other than the critical stimulus
"Only class S of subjective tasks can measure awareness" Very strong assumption: For all measures NS, qcCN Construct objective analogs to the subjective tasks (often possible)
"Only class O of objective tasks can measure awareness" Very strong assumption: For all measures NO, qcCN Construct subjective analogs to the objective tasks (usually possible)
"Only M can measure awareness" Prohibitive assumption: For all measures NM, qcCN Show that measures other than M can ask for the critical feature
"M is an exhaustively valid measure of awareness" Strong assumption: CM includes all theoretically relevant cues Show that M fails to respond to some theoretically relevant cue that another measure can respond to
"M is an exhaustively reliable measure of awareness" Prohibitive assumption: M is an exhaustive integrator of all theoretically relevant cues Show that M can fail to respond strictly monotonically to a change in the critical feature