Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 28.
Published in final edited form as: Can J Chem. 2023 Aug 30;101(10):765–772. doi: 10.1139/cjc-2023-0033

Table 2.

Base optimization for the synthesis of 1.

graphic file with name nihms-1932996-t0002.jpg
Entry Base Yield (%)-drya Yield (%)-not dryb Yield (%)-dioxane/water 4:1
1 Li3PO4 0 4 19
2 Na3PO4 39 41 75
3 K3PO4 51 17 11
4 NaF 14 4 37
5 KF 51 24 54
6 KHF2 76 25 26
7 CsF 69 8 58
8 NBu4F ND 12 14
9 Li2CO3 0 4 54
10 Na2CO3 33 7 35
11 K2CO3 26 19 25
12 Cs2CO3 15 9 10
13 NaOH NP 36 5
14 KOH NP 7 18
15 Et3N 4 9 9
16 Pyridine 0 4 10
17 DBU NP 6 8
18 None - - 10

Note: Reaction conditions: PyFluor (0.3 mmol), 2-thiopheneboronic acid pinacol ester (0.45 mmol), Pd(dppf)Cl2 (0.03 mmol), base (0.9 mmol), biphenyl (internal standard, 0.06 mmol), and solvent mixture (1 mL in a closed 1 dram vial).

a

Dioxane was degassed by three cycles of freeze–pump–thaw and dried under molecular sieves (10% v/w) for 48 h before using it.

b

Solvent was used as purchased. Yield calculated using biphenyl as internal standard (HPLC/UV). NP = not performed.