Table 6.
OLS and Ordered Logistic Regression Models Predicting Workplace Experience Measures with LGBT Status, Run separately for Women and Men.
| MEN (N = 22,550) | WOMEN (N = 14,669) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGBT coefficient | Std. Error | LGBT Coefficient | Std. Error | |
| Treatment as Employee Models | ||||
| Success fostered | −0.119† | 0.063 | −0.099† | 0.051 |
| Transparent evaluations | −0.066 | 0.055 | −0.112† | 0.060 |
| Adequate resources | −0.153 ** | 0.055 | −0.177 ** | 0.069 |
| Respected by supervisor | −0.061 | 0.044 | −0.092 | 0.094 |
| Diversity supported | −0.106† | 0.053 | −0.216† | 0.127 |
| Work Satisfaction Models | ||||
| Personal satisfaction | −0.049† | 0.027 | −0.045 | 0.073 |
| Working conditions | −0.079 | 0.063 | −0.087 | 0.112 |
| Employee empowerment | −0.100 * | 0.049 | −0.136 | 0.086 |
| Procedure satisfaction | −0.145 * | 0.069 | −0.130 ** | 0.046 |
| Job satisfaction^ | −0.456 * | 0.196 | −0.210 | 0.216 |
Note:
p < 0.10,
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001 (two-tailed test).
indicates ordered logit model; all other models are OLS regressions.