Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 28.
Published in final edited form as: Work Occup. 2022 Feb 21;49(2):187–228. doi: 10.1177/07308884221080938

Appendix Table A.3:

OLS and Logit Models Predicting Workplace Experiences among LGBT Employees at NASA-East and NASA-South (N=43)

Employer has done Enough Positive LGBT Wkplace Climate Acknowledge LGBT status Harassed in past 5 yrs (logit) LGBT employees must work harder Contributions to group meetings overlooked
Coeff SE Coeff SE Coeff SE Coeff SE Coeff SE Coeff SE
NASA-East −1.159 .430 ** −.538 .260 * −.671 .324 * 2.202 1.171 + .771 .417 + .718 .305 *
Women −.234 .426 −.686 .257 * −.257 .320 −.134 1.291 .258 .412 .179 .301
Racial/Ethnic minority −.158 .586 −.346 .351 −.706 .441 −.401 1.290 .443 .567 −.225 .415
Subcontractor status −.319 .471 −.497 .284 + −.818 .354 * .408 1.111 .258 .456 .199 .333
Constant 4.671 .362 *** 4.279 .219 *** 3.239 .272 *** −3.190 1.21 2.287 .350 *** 1.910 .256 ***
Adjusted R-squared .110 .256 .226 .138 .043 .063

Note:

+

p<.10;

*

p<.05;

**

p<.01;

***

p<.001;

Comparison category for racial/ethnic minority status is white; comparison category for women is men (no survey respondents identified as gender non-binary).