Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 19;15:100132. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100132

Table 2.

Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for acute kidney injury associated with apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and warfarin from network meta-analysis.

Apixaban Rivaroxaban Dabigatran Warfarin
Overalla
Compared to apixaban 1 0.98 (0.85, 1.12) 0.82 (0.68, 0.99) 1.22 (1.10, 1.35)
Compared to rivaroxaban 1.02 (0.89, 1.17) 1 0.84 (0.72, 0.98) 1.23 (1.16, 1.32)
Compared to dabigatran 1.22 (1.01, 1.46) 1.19 (1.02, 1.39) 1 1.47 (1.30, 1.69)
Compared to warfarin 0.82 (0.74, 0.91) 0.81 (0.76, 0.86) 0.68 (0.59, 0.77) 1



Patients without CKDb, c
Compared to apixaban 1 1.12 (0.83, 1.50) 0.93 (0.69, 1.24) 1.43 (1.05, 1.96)
Compared to rivaroxaban 0.89 (0.67, 1.20) 1 0.82 (0.63, 1.08) 1.28 (1.06, 1.56)
Compared to dabigatran 1.08 (0.81, 1.46) 1.21 (0.92, 1.59) 1 1.59 (1.49, 1.72)
Compared to warfarin 0.70 (0.51, 0.95) 0.78 (0.64, 0.94) 0.63 (0.58, 0.67) 1



Patients with CKD
Compared to apixaban 1 1.02 (0.65, 1.57) 0.80 (0.50, 1.24) 1.54 (1.02, 2.33)
Compared to rivaroxaban 0.98 (0.64, 1.53) 1 0.78 (0.51, 1.19) 1.45 (1.14, 1.85)
Compared to dabigatran 1.25 (0.81, 1.99) 1.28 (0.84, 1.95) 1 1.89 (1.75, 2.04)
Compared to warfarin 0.65 (0.43, 0.98) 0.69 (0.54, 0.88) 0.53 (0.49, 0.57) 1
a

Studies included: Harel et al., 2021, Perez et al., 2021, Hernandez et al., 2020, Coleman et al., 2019, Shin et al., 2018, Yao et al., 2017.

b

Studies included: Harel et al., 2021, Hernandez et al., 2020, Chan et al., 2018, Shin et al., 2018, Yao et al., 2017, Chan et al., 2016.

c

CKD, chronic kidney disease, defined as either a documented history of chronic kidney disease or estimated glomerular filtration rate of 60 ml/min/1.73m2 or less.