Table 4.
Results of the in vitro chromosome aberration test for the no-pain pharmacopuncture extract in CHL/IU cells with or without metabolic activation (S9 mixture)
| Test substance | Dose (%) | RPD (%) | PD | S9 mix | Trt-rec time (h) |
No. of cells analyzed | Number of cells with structural aberrations | Number of cells with numerical aberrations | Othersa) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Ctb | Csb | Cte | Cse | Frg | Gap | Total (%) | End | Pol | Total (%) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Ctg | Csg | Gap- | Gap+ | ||||||||||||||||||
| Negative control (saline) |
0 | 100 | 1.54 | – | 6-18 | 150 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
| NPP | 2.5 | 95.1 | - | – | 6-18 | 150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
| 5 | 92.0 | - | – | 6-18 | 150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | |||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
| 10 | 89.9 | - | – | 6-18 | 150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.3) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | |||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
| MMC | 0.1 mg/mL | 51.4 | - | – | 6-18 | 150 | 12 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 63** (21.0) | 63 (21.0) | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.3) | 0 | ||
| 12 | 0 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| Negative control (saline) |
0 | 100 | 1.52 | + | 6-18 | 150 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
| NPP | 2.5 | 98.5 | - | + | 6-18 | 150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
| 5 | 91.7 | - | + | 6-18 | 150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | |||
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
| 10 | 87.3 | - | + | 6-18 | 150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | |||
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
| B(a)P | 20 mg/mL | 55.4 | - | + | 6-18 | 150 | 13 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 64** (21.3) | 64 (21.3) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | ||
| 10 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Negative control (saline) |
0 | 100 | 1.53 | – | 24-0 | 150 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
| NPP | 2.5 | 96.0 | - | – | 24-0 | 150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
| 5 | 93.9 | - | – | 24-0 | 150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | |||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
| 10 | 92.4 | - | – | 24-0 | 150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.3) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | |||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
| MMC | 0.1 mg/mL | 52.7 | - | – | 24-0 | 150 | 13 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 66** (22.0) | 66 (22.0) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | ||
| 12 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
B(a)P, benzo(a)pyrene; CHL/IU, Chinese hamster lung; csb, chromosome break; cse, chromosome exchange; csg, chromosome gap; ctb, chromatid break; cte, chromatid exchange; ctg, chromatid gap; end, endoreduplication; frg, fragmentation; gap-, total number of cells with structural aberrations excluding gap; gap+, total number of cells with structural aberrations including gap; MMC, mitomycin C; NPP, no-pain pharmacopuncture, a four-herb extract consisting of Corydalis tube, Chaenomelis Fructus, Paeoniae Radix, and Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma; pol, polyploidy; RPD, relative population doubling; Trt-rec time, treatment-recovery time.
a)Others were excluded from the number of cells with chromosomal aberrations.
Significant difference from the negative control according to Fisher’s exact test: **p < 0.01.
Relative population doubling (RPD) = (no. population doubling in treated cultures) (no. population doubling in control cultures) × 100.
Population doubling (PD) = [log (post-treatment cell number/initial cell number)]/log 2.