Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 16;43(14):1033–1049. doi: 10.1038/s41388-024-02968-8

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of potential prognostic variables in GC patients.

Variables Subset Hazard ratio for OS (95%CI) p value
Univariate analysis (n = 80)
Age (years) <60 vs ≥60 0.685
Gender Male vs Female 0.932
Invasion depth T1 + T2 vs T3 + T4 0.221
Tumor differentiation Poor vs Moderate/Well 0.092
Lymphatic metastasis N0 + N1 vs N2 + N3 1.512 (1.023–2.235) 0.038*
Distal metastasis Absent vs Present 5.446 (1.589–18.666) 0.007*
TNM stage I + II vs III + IV 2.825 (1.322–6.037) 0.007*
Tumor size (cm) <5 vs ≥5 3.297 (1.295–8.395) 0.012*
circUSP1 level Low vs High 3.213 (1.260–8.192) 0.015*
Multivariate analysis (n = 80)
Lymphatic metastasis N0 + N1 vs N2 + N3 0.490
Distal metastasis Absent vs present 0.113
TNM stage I + II vs III + IV 0.501
Tumor size (cm) < 5 vs ≥ 5 2.974 (1.130–7.826) 0.027*
circUSP1 level Low vs High 2.777 (1.051–7.336) 0.039*

Bold values indicate significance at p < 0.05.