Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 15;11:1371690. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1371690

Table 2.

Comparison of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) level and the proportions of dogs with altered ESR level in healthy dogs (i.e., control group), heartworm-infected dogs (i.e., Dirofilaria group), heartworm-infected L. infantum seropositive dogs affected by a non-active form of leishmaniosis (i.e., Dirofilaria/Leishmania non-active group), and heartworm-infected L. infantum seropositive dogs affected by an active form of leishmaniosis (i.e., Dirofilaria/Leishmania active group).

Parameters* Control group
(n = 22)
(a)
Dirofilaria group
(n = 18)
(b)
Dirofilaria/Leishmania non-active group
(n = 21)
(c)
Dirofilaria/Leishmania active group
(n = 8)
(d)
p^ Comparisons
(b) vs. (a) (c) vs. (a) (d) vs. (a) (c) vs. (b) (d) vs. (b) (d) vs. (c)
ESR 7.5 (5–11) 12.5 (12–16) 11 (10–16) 46 (27–62) 0.0001 0.0002 0.004 <0.0001 0.18 0.01 0.001
ESR > 8.0 mm/h 10 (45.4) 16 (88.9) 18 (85.7) 8 (100.0) 0.002 ѱ 0.004 ¥ 0.006 ¥ 0.007 ¥ 0.77¥ 0.33¥ 0.26¥

*As median and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables, and as frequency and percentage (%) for categorical variables. ^Kruskal–Wallis rank test; ѱFisher Exact test; Dunn’s test; ¥Proportion test. The bold values indicate the statistically significant results.