Table 3.
Pros | Cons | |
---|---|---|
Homer Pro | - Straightforward to use; - Sizing optimization tool. |
- Solutions are based on first degree linear equations; - Limited libraries for models of energy conversion systems. |
TRNSYS | - Dynamically simulation of any energy conversion system for electric and thermal energy production with high resolution; - Modelling of both buildings and plants. |
- Time consuming; - Technical expertise. |
HOGA | - Multi objective optimization; - Simulation with high time resolution |
- Lack of sensitivity and risk analysis; - Maximum limits on daily electric loads. |
Hybrid2 | - Availability of several electric load options; - Comprehensive dispatching alternatives. |
- Absence of models from own library; - Ignore the dynamic behaviour of the thermal and electric energy systems. |
RETscreen | - Large weather database; - Excel based tool. |
- Ignore the dynamic behaviour of the thermal and electric energy systems. - Disregard the dynamic performance of thermal and electric energy systems |