Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 9;101(36):e30559. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030559

Table 2.

Meta-analysis of SOX2 expression and prognosis in gastric cancer.

Categories Studies (patients) HR (95% CI) I2 (%) P h Z P
OS 10 (1321) 1.485 (1.022–2.160)R 88.6 <.01 2.07 .04
Analysis method
 Multivariate analysis 5 (810) 1.275 (0.576–2.823)R 89.2 <.01 0.60 .55
 Univariate analysis 10 (1321) 1.606 (1.134–2.274)R 90.1 <.01 2.67 <.01
Recruitment time
 Exceeding 2010 5 (638) 1.873 (1.041–3.371)R 89.7 <.01 2.09 .04
 Up to 2010 5 (683) 1.180 (0.729–1.910)R 82.9 <.01 0.67 .50
Follow up period
 >5yr 7 (1075) 1.642 (1.066–2.527)R 89.5 <.01 2.25 .02
 ≤5 yr 3 (246) 1.181 (0.402–3.468)R 90.0 <.01 0.30 .76
Cutoff value
 More than 5% of cells stained 7 (1036) 1.730 (1.162–2.577)R 84.9 <.01 2.70 <.01
 Less than 5% of cells stained 2 (185) 0.625 (0.246–1.583)R 87.4 <.01 0.99 .32
Research region
 East Asia 8 (1045) 1.312 (0.874–1.970)R 90.3 <.01 1.31 .19
 Non-east Asia 2 (276) 2.790 (1.596–4.877)R 0.0 .43 3.60 <.01

CI = confidence interval, HR = hazard ratio, OS = overall survival, P = P-value for statistical significance based on Z test, Ph = P-value for heterogeneity based on Q test,

R

= pooled HRs were derived from random-effect model.