Table 4.
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 assessment success criteria and the assessment.
| App name | Success criteria for WCAG 2.1 A | Success criteria for WCAG 2.1 AA | ||||||||
|
|
Perceivable | Operable | Understandable | Robust | Overall passing | Perceivable | Operable | Understandable | Robust | Overall passing |
| BEAT-D | 4/5 | 7/9 | 5/5a | 2/2a | 0.86 | 6/13 | 9/12 | 9/9a | 2/3 | 0.70 |
| DC Carehomes | 4/5 | 6/10 | 73/5 | 2/2a | 0.68 | 8/13 | 8/13 | 7/9 | 2/3 | 0.66 |
| DIYModify | 6/9 | 6/7 | 4/4a | 2/2a | 0.82 | 8/17 | 8/9 | 7/7 | 2/2a | 0.71 |
| HomeFit AR | 5/5a | 4/8 | 2/4 | 2/2a | 0.68 | 8/12 | 4/10 | 6/8 | 2/2a | 0.63 |
| MapIt Desktop | 1/4 | 7/10 | 3/4 | 2/2a | 0.65 | 1/11 | 8/13 | 6/7 | 3/3a | 0.53 |
| MapIt Mobile | 1/4 | 8/8a | 3/5 | 2/2a | 0.73 | 4/11 | 8/10 | 6/9 | 2/2a | 0.63 |
aApps fulfilled a subcriterion of the WCAG 2.1. These items show that all apps met at least 1 or 2 subcriteria of the WCAG 2.1 despite their failure to meet WCAG 2.1 in its entirety.