Table 1.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, developed per the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study Design framework, for the scoping review.
| Facet | Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
| Population | Any Twitter (Twitter, Inc) data on Twitter users, such as posts, profile details, photos, or avatars | Studies evaluating prediction from data on other social media platforms, such as Facebook (Meta Platforms, Inc) or Instagram (Meta Platforms, Inc) |
| Intervention | Methods for predicting the gender or age of Twitter users; articles that used machine learning, natural language processing, human in the loop, or other computationally assisted methods to predict the gender or age of the users | Studies that contained no computation methods |
| Comparator | Any or none; we included any studies irrespective of whether they had a comparator and, if they did have a comparator, irrespective of what that was | N/Aa |
| Outcome | Gender or age prediction | Any other demographic trait prediction |
| Study design | Any type of peer-reviewed study reporting on the methods used to predict gender or age; such information must be the primary focus of the study or reported in enough detail to be reproducible | Discussion papers, commentaries, and letters |
| Date | 2017 or later | Before 2017 |
| Language | All | None |
aN/A: not applicable.