Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 21;63:13–18. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.03.006

Table 2.

Surgical planning of nerve-sparing surgery by different observers

Bilateral + contralateral NSS
Change when leaving out contralateral biopsy results
Difference Cohen’s kappa
With result from contralateral SBx Without result from contralateral SBx Yes to no No to yes
Urologist 1, n (%) 76 (95) 77 (96) 0 1 (1.3) 1 (1.3) 0.85
Urologist 2, n (%) 74 (93) 79 (99) 0 5 (6.3) 5 (6.3) 0.27
Urologist 3, n (%) 76 (95) 75 (94) 2 (2.5) 1 (1.3) 3 (3.8) 0.65
Urologist 4, n (%) 65 (81) 63 (79) 13 (16) 11 (14) 24 (30) 0.06
Urologist 5, n (%) 73 (91) 76 (95) 0 3 (3.8) 3 (3.8) 0.71
Overall n (%, 95% CI) 364 (91%, 88-94) 370 (93%, 90-95) 15 (3.8%, 2.1-6.1) 21 (5.3%, 3.3-7.9) 36 (9.0%, 6.4-12)
Fleiss’ kappa 0.44 0.15

CI = confidence interval; NSS = nerve-sparing surgery; RARP = robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; SBx = systematic biopsy.

The assessments of different urologists in the surgical planning of patients undergoing RARP were based on a subset of clinical, radiological, and pathological clinical file data. The percentages point out in which patients contralateral or bilateral NSS would be performed with and without the diagnostic information obtained from contralateral SBx. Intraobserver agreement is expressed as Cohen’s kappa, and interobserver agreement is expressed as Fleiss’ kappa.