Table 2.
First author (year of publication) | Subjects (number) | Intervention/duration | RS | Insulin | Prandial glucose | Others |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Roberson et al. (2005) 35 | Healthy (10) | Randomized, crossover trial/4 weeks | 30 g RS2 | ↓ | NS | No effect on fasting glucose levels |
Bodinham et al. (2010) 15 | Healthy (20) | Randomized, crossover trial/two meals | 48 g HAM‐RS2 | ↓ | NS | No significant change of insulin sensitivity |
Bodinham et al. (2014) 41 | T2DM (17) | Randomized, crossover trial/12 weeks | 40 g HAM‐RS2 | NS | ↓ |
No significant change of HbA1c Reduced GLP‐1 on RS regimen |
Hallström et al. (2011) 37 | Healthy (14) | Randomized, crossover trial/12 weeks | 7.7 g RS | ↑ | ↓ | |
Li et al. (2010) 38 | Healthy (16) | Crossover trial/one meal | 8 g RS | ↓ | ↓ | |
Al‐Tamimi et al. (2010) 39 | Healthy (13) | Randomized, crossover trial/one meal | 20 g RS4XL | ↓ | ↓ | |
Lin et al. (2015) 40 | Healthy (40) | Randomized, 2‐regimen, crossover/one meal |
PPB‐R‐203 RS3 Matched daily energy needs |
↓ | ↓ | Reduced AUC on RS regimen |
T2DM (44) | NA | ↓ | ||||
Kwak et al. (2012) 36 | IFG, IGT, T2DM (90) | Randomized, placebo controlled | 6.51 g RS | NS | ↓ | Improved surrogate markers of endothelial function on RS regimen |
AUC, area under the curve; HAM, high‐amylose maize; NA, not applicable; NS, not significant; RS, resistant starch.