Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 8;15(4):395–401. doi: 10.1111/jdi.14139

Table 2.

Summary of human studies using resistant starch

First author (year of publication) Subjects (number) Intervention/duration RS Insulin Prandial glucose Others
Roberson et al. (2005) 35 Healthy (10) Randomized, crossover trial/4 weeks 30 g RS2 NS No effect on fasting glucose levels
Bodinham et al. (2010) 15 Healthy (20) Randomized, crossover trial/two meals 48 g HAM‐RS2 NS No significant change of insulin sensitivity
Bodinham et al. (2014) 41 T2DM (17) Randomized, crossover trial/12 weeks 40 g HAM‐RS2 NS

No significant change of HbA1c

Reduced GLP‐1 on RS regimen

Hallström et al. (2011) 37 Healthy (14) Randomized, crossover trial/12 weeks 7.7 g RS
Li et al. (2010) 38 Healthy (16) Crossover trial/one meal 8 g RS
Al‐Tamimi et al. (2010) 39 Healthy (13) Randomized, crossover trial/one meal 20 g RS4XL
Lin et al. (2015) 40 Healthy (40) Randomized, 2‐regimen, crossover/one meal

PPB‐R‐203 RS3

Matched daily energy needs

Reduced AUC on RS regimen
T2DM (44) NA
Kwak et al. (2012) 36 IFG, IGT, T2DM (90) Randomized, placebo controlled 6.51 g RS NS Improved surrogate markers of endothelial function on RS regimen

AUC, area under the curve; HAM, high‐amylose maize; NA, not applicable; NS, not significant; RS, resistant starch.