Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 29;2015(6):CD006027. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006027.pub2

Iguchi 2002.

Methods
  • Study design: parallel RCT

  • Study duration: started January 1999

  • Duration of follow‐up: 24 h

Participants
  • Country: Japan

  • Setting: single centre

  • Patients with renal colic

  • Number: treatment group 1 (30); treatment group 2 (30)

  • Mean age ± SD (years): treatment group 1 (43.3 ± 14.8); treatment group 2 (41.3 ± 12.4)

  • Sex (M/F): treatment group 1 (23/7); treatment group 2 (21/9)

  • Exclusion criteria: previous history of renal colic treatment; allergy, lower abdominal pain

Interventions Treatment group 1
  • Butylscopolamine: 40 mg (IV)

  • Sulpyrine: 500 mg (IV)

  • 5% glucose: 20 mL (IV)


Treatment group 2
  • 1% lidocaine: 10 to 15 mL to trigger point (local)

Outcomes
  • VAS‐100: 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 min

Notes
  • Source of funding: NS

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Only described as simple randomisation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Medication used High risk Not blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No missing outcome data
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All pre‐specified primary and secondary outcomes are reported
Other bias Low risk The study appears to be free of other sources of bias