Table 3.
Analysis of variance for all the accessions comparing manual versus pipeline measurements after implementing QC
Samples | Effect | DFn | DFd | F | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1_7 | Benchmark | 2 | 15 | 0.749 | 0.49 |
13_3 | Benchmark | 2 | 15 | 0.714 | 0.506 |
15_27 | Benchmark | 2 | 15 | 0.132 | 0.877 |
16_34 | Benchmark | 2 | 15 | 0.758 | 0.486 |
17_23 | Benchmark | 2 | 15 | 0.297 | 0.747 |
19_3 | Benchmark | 2 | 12 | 5.65 | 0.019 |
2_12 | Benchmark | 2 | 15 | 0.881 | 0.435 |
20_29 | Benchmark | 2 | 15 | 0.03 | 0.97 |
21_12 | Benchmark | 2 | 15 | 0.169 | 0.846 |
22_22 | Benchmark | 2 | 15 | 0.017 | 0.983 |
25_8 | Benchmark | 2 | 12 | 1.61 | 0.241 |
26_15 | Benchmark | 2 | 15 | 0.002 | 0.998 |
27_10 | Benchmark | 2 | 12 | 0.747 | 0.495 |
28_11 | Benchmark | 2 | 15 | 0.069 | 0.934 |
3_23 | Benchmark | 2 | 15 | 0.216 | 0.808 |
4_18 | Benchmark | 2 | 15 | 0.07 | 0.933 |
7_18 | Benchmark | 2 | 15 | 0.099 | 0.906 |