Abstract
Dysphagia or difficulty in swallowing is a common condition affecting millions worldwide. It can occur due to structural problems, neurological disorders, cancer treatment, aging, etc. Swallowing rehabilitation aims to help patients regain safe and efficient swallowing function through compensatory strategies and exercises. This literature review examines the recent advancements in swallowing rehabilitation techniques over the past three decades, with a focus on innovations in diagnostics, personalized medicine, and patient care.
Keywords: Dysphagia, Personalized Rehabilitation, Virtual Rehabilitation, Swallowing Disorders
Introduction
Swallowing is a complex neuromuscular activity involving the coordinated function of > 25 pairs of muscles in the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, and esophagus [1]. Dysphagia or disordered swallowing is characterized by difficulty in forming or moving the bolus safely from the mouth to the stomach. It is estimated to affect ∼350 million people worldwide [2]. The prevalence of dysphagia ranges from 13 to 38% in acute stroke patients [3], 13–78% in nursing home residents [4], and 15–40% in head and neck cancer patients after chemoradiotherapy [5]. Dysphagia can lead to serious complications such as aspiration pneumonia, malnutrition, dehydration, airway obstruction, which significantly impairs quality of life.
Swallowing rehabilitation aims to help patients regain functional swallowing ability through compensatory strategies, postural changes, swallowing maneuvers, and exercises [6]. Over the past decade, advances in diagnostic methods, technology-based interventions, and patient-centered care models have led to remarkable progress in the field of dysphagia rehabilitation. This literature review examines the recent advancements in swallowing assessment and rehabilitation techniques.
Review Methodology
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed for studies published over the past 30 years on swallowing rehabilitation in adults. Key search terms used were “deglutition disorders,“ “dysphagia,“ “swallowing disorders,“ “rehabilitation,“ “therapy,“ “treatment,“ and relevant Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms. Additional filters applied were: clinical trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, humans, and English language. After screening of titles, abstracts, full texts and reference lists of selected articles, 50 relevant studies were selected for this review.
Advancements in Assessment
Accurate assessment is crucial for identifying the physiology and severity of dysphagia, which guides appropriate rehabilitation [7]. High-resolution manometry (HRM) provides a detailed analysis of pressure changes during swallowing to identify impairments in strength or coordination [8]. Intrabolus pressure (IBP) measured by HRM can predict aspiration risk and guide personalized interventions [9]. Novel HRM metrics like Contractile Integral (CI) help gauge muscle contractility affecting bolus propulsion [10]. Adding impedance to HRM can simultaneously assess bolus flow [11].
Video Fluoroscopic Swallow Study (VFSS) visualizes swallowing physiology dynamics via X-ray. Spatial-temporal variables measured on VFSS help quantify oral and pharyngeal dysfunction [12]. Combining VFSS with 3D motion tracking of anatomical landmarks improves diagnostic sensitivity of identifying aspiration [13]. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) uses a nasolaryngoscope to visualize pharyngeal swallowing mechanics [14]. FEES with sensory testing (FEESST) delivers air pulses to assess sensory thresholds, which provides additional insight into neurological dysphagia [15].
Surface electromyography (sEMG) quantifies activity of swallowing musculature like mylohyoid and infrahyoid muscles during different phases of swallowing [16]. Pattern recognition using machine learning models can automatically identify impaired swallows from sEMG data [17]. Multiple mini-array sEMG provides topographic data on muscle activation timing that is useful for therapy guidance [18].
High-resolution pharyngeal manometry, VFSS, FEES, sEMG and other instrumented assessments have enhanced the quality of information gained during clinical swallow evaluations. This has translated to more targeted and individualized management.
Personalized Medicine and Goal-directed Therapy
Personalized medicine involves tailoring treatment based on an individual’s specific physiology and goals [19]. For swallowing rehabilitation, this translates to focused therapy guided by instrumental assessment findings. Pharyngeal HRM metrics can predict success of specific maneuvers like Mendelsohn maneuver in post-stroke dysphagia (20). Similarly, VFSS biomechanics help select optimal dietary textures and posture strategies [20]. FEESST levels guide choice of sensory interventions like thermal-tactile stimulation [21]. sEMG biofeedback targets specific muscle groups requiring strengthening [22].
Goal-directed swallowing rehabilitation involves optimizing training to target the patient’s personalized therapy goals like safe oral intake, cough reduction, or domain-specific quality of life [23]. Goal attainment scaling enables quantitative tracking of progress towards realistic individual goals [24]. Defining more specific and measurable goals using SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, timed) framework has enhanced patient motivation and compliance [25]. Patient-reported outcome measures like SWAL-QOL, MDADI, etc. capture dimensions like burden, food selection, fear, mental health that are crucial for holistic goal setting and evaluation [26].
The shift towards individualized medicine has improved the efficacy of swallowing therapy. Therapy protocols are now designed based on instrumental evaluation findings and tailored to each patient’s deficit areas and goals.
Innovations in Rehabilitation Techniques
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
Pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PEST) delivers electrical impulses to the pharyngeal wall to strengthen muscles involved in the pharyngeal phase of swallowing [27]. In acute stroke, PEST paired with swallowing significantly improved function and aspiration status [28]. Intrapharyngeal PEST improved airway protection compared to traditional therapy in treatment-resistant chronic dysphagia [29]. Cranial nerve non-invasive neuromodulation (CN-NINM) using transcutaneous electrical stimulation of facial and hypoglossal nerves strengthened neuromuscular control for swallowing [30].
-
2.
Expiratory Muscle Strength Training
Expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) uses specifically designed devices to provide resistive load during exhalation, thereby strengthening submental muscles involved in airway protection [31]. EMST was found effective for chronic pharyngeal dysphagia with high compliance and reduced aspiration post-training [32]. Different EMST protocols are being investigated for optimal load delivery [33].
-
3.
Chin Tuck Maneuver Training
The chin tuck posture mechanically narrows the entrance to the airway to prevent aspiration. Chin tuck maneuver training uses biofeedback to retrain this protective strategy. In Parkinson’s disease patients, it improved hyolaryngeal excursion and swallowing safety [34]. Automated chin prompter devices, along with surface EMG biofeedback, have been developed to optimize training quality and compliance [35].
-
4.
Virtual Rehabilitation
Virtual reality-based systems provide simulated swallowing practice in immersive, interactive environments. VR training builds strength through repetitive effortful swallowing and cues proper posture [36]. VR with biofeedback retrained safe swallowing in stroke survivors by enabling visualization of swallowing biomechanics [37]. Tele-rehabilitation through ‘virtual’ video visits also increased access during the COVID-19 pandemic [38].
-
5.
Robotics
Robotic technologies have expanded options for delivering high-intensity, reproducible therapies. Robotic pharyngeal exercisers like the Robotic Repetitive Motion device provide passive motion to improve strength and mobility [39]. Robotic mouthpiece and handheld devices train lingual strength and control through games using biofeedback [40]. Robots augment traditional therapy to improve compliance and motivation.
-
6.
Other Emerging Modalities
Other novel modalities like transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) [41], transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) [42], and cryostimulation of the faucial pillars [43] are being investigated as adjuncts to enhance post-stroke swallow recovery. Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) expands lung volumes to allow safer swallowing [44]. Medications like ACE inhibitors and gabapentin may benefit select patients, however robust evidence for pharmacologic dysphagia therapy is lacking [45, 46].
Challenges and Future Directions
Despite advancements, several challenges exist in swallowing rehabilitation: (i) Lack of robust large-scale randomized controlled trials establishing efficacy and optimal protocols for emerging interventions. (ii) Limited accessibility of instrumental procedures and specialized therapies. (iii) Need for customized, AI-driven platforms that can integrate assessment data to design tailored rehabilitation regimens for precision dysphagia care [47]. (iv) Shortage of adequately trained healthcare professionals across disciplines to provide holistic swallowing treatment [48].
Future work should focus on multi-center collaborative trials for high-level evidence and consensus on best practices. Wider adoption of telerehabilitation can improve access to quality therapy. Development of more affordable, patient-friendly equipment and technologies can enable home-based rehabilitation to improve outcomes. Patient education, engagement, and caregiver training are integral to long-term management. Interprofessional swallowing teams with expertise across otolaryngology, speech-language pathology, physiotherapy, and nutrition are needed to provide comprehensive dysphagia care.
Conclusion
In summary, swallowing rehabilitation has made remarkable progress in recent years through advances in diagnostics, personalized medicine approaches, novel treatment modalities and technologies like biofeedback, VR, robotics, and telehealth. Continued research on outcome-driven interventions, along with greater access to specialized care, has the potential to reduce the global burden of dysphagia and improve the quality of life for millions affected by swallowing disorders.
Author Contribution
All the authors have equally contributed to the case report. VMS is the major contributor in writing the manuscript. KR participated in editing and interpretation along with VMS.
Funding
There was no funding required to take up the study.
Data Availability
The datasets during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
The study doesn’t require ethical clearance as it’s a review article.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Steele CM, Alsanei WA, Ayanikalath S, Barbon CE, Chen J, Cichero JA, et al. The influence of food texture and liquid consistency modification on swallowing physiology and function: a systematic review. Dysphagia. 2015;30(1):2–26. doi: 10.1007/s00455-014-9578-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sura L, Madhavan A, Carnaby G, Crary MA. Dysphagia in the elderly: management and nutritional considerations. Clin Interv Aging. 2012;7:287–298. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S23404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Martino R, Foley N, Bhogal S, Diamant N, Speechley M, Teasell R. Dysphagia after Stroke: incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary Complications. Stroke. 2005;36(12):2756–2763. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000190056.76543.eb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kawashima K, Motohashi Y, Fujishima I. Prevalence of dysphagia among community-dwelling elderly individuals as estimated using a questionnaire for dysphagia screening. Dysphagia. 2004;19(4):266–271. doi: 10.1007/s00455-004-0013-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shinn EH, Basen-Engquist K, Baum G, Steen S, Bauman RF, Morrison W, et al. Adherence to preventive exercises and self-reported swallowing outcomes in post-radiation Head and Neck cancer patients. Head Neck. 2013;35(12):1707–1712. doi: 10.1002/hed.23255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Steele CM, Namasivayam-MacDonald AM, Guida BT, Cichero JA, Duivestein J, Hanson B, et al. Creation and initial validation of the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative Functional Diet Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(5):934–944. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.D’Netto P, Rumbach A, Dunn K, Finch E. Clinical predictors of dysphagia recovery after Stroke: a systematic review. Dysphagia. 2023;38(1):1–22. doi: 10.1007/s00455-022-10443-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kunieda K, Fujishima I, Wakabayashi H, Ohno T, Shigematsu T, Itoda M, Oshima F, Mori T, Ogawa N, Ogawa S. Relationship between tongue pressure and pharyngeal function assessed using high-resolution manometry in older dysphagia patients with Sarcopenia: a pilot study. Dysphagia. 2021;36:33–40. doi: 10.1007/s00455-020-10095-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Newman R, Vilardell N, Clavé P, Speyer R. Effect of bolus viscosity on the safety and efficacy of swallowing and the kinematics of the swallow response in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia: white paper by the European Society for Swallowing Disorders (ESSD) Dysphagia. 2016;31:232–249. doi: 10.1007/s00455-016-9696-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Park CH, Lee YT, Yi Y, Lee JS, Park JH, Yoon KJ. Ability of high-resolution manometry to determine feeding method and to predict aspiration Pneumonia in patients with dysphagia. Official J Am Coll Gastroenterology| ACG. 2017;112(7):1074–1083. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pandolfino JE, Bulsiewicz WJ. Evaluation of esophageal motor disorders in the era of high-resolution manometry and intraluminal impedance. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2009;11(3):182–189. doi: 10.1007/s11894-009-0029-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Leonard RJ, White C, McKenzie S, Belafsky PC. Effects of Bolus rheology on aspiration in patients with dysphagia. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114(4):590–594. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.07.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Doeltgen SH, Ong E, Scholten I, Cock C, Omari T. Biomechanical quantification of Mendelsohn maneuver and effortful swallowing on pharyngoesophageal function. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. 2017;157(5):816–823. doi: 10.1177/0194599817708173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.American Occupational Therapy Association The practice of occupational therapy in feeding, eating, and swallowing. Am J Occup Ther. 2017;71(7112410015):10–5014. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2017.716S04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pongpipatpaiboon K, Inamoto Y, Saitoh E, Kagaya H, Shibata S, Aoyagi Y, Fujii N, Palmer JB, Fernández MG. Pharyngeal swallowing in older adults: kinematic analysis using three-dimensional dynamic computed tomography. J Rehabil. 2018;45(12):959–966. doi: 10.1111/joor.12703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kelly AM, Drinnan MJ, Leslie P. Assessing penetration and aspiration: how do videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing compare? Laryngoscope. 2007;117(10):1723–1727. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e318123ee6a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kim T, Goodhart K, Aviv JE, Sacco RL, Diamond B, Kaplan S, Close LG. FEESST: a new bedside endoscopic test of the motor and sensory components of swallowing. Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology. 1998;107(5):378–387. doi: 10.1177/000348949810700503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Botter EA, Gazzoni M, Viganò M, Giangrande A Assessment of the swallowing function through High-Density surface EMG
- 19.Crary MA, Groher ME. Basic concepts of surface electromyographic biofeedback in the treatment of dysphagia: A tutorial. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 9(2):116 – 25.20. Lee JH, Kim JW, Kyong JO, Kang HJ, Park JH, Nam HS (2000) Multichannel surface electromyography to evaluate dysphagia: A case study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(7):e29119
- 21.Steele CM, Van Lieshout PH. Influence of bolus consistency on lingual behaviors in sequential swallowing. Dysphagia. 2004;19:192–206. doi: 10.1007/s00455-004-0006-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Carnaby-Mann GD, Crary MA. Adjunctive neuromuscular electrical stimulation for treatment-refractory dysphagia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008;117:279–287. doi: 10.1177/000348940811700407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dziewas R, Stellato R, Van Der Tweel I, Walther E, Werner CJ, Braun T, Citerio G, Jandl M, Friedrichs M, Nötzel K, Vosko MR. Pharyngeal electrical stimulation for early decannulation in tracheotomised patients with neurogenic dysphagia after Stroke (PHAST-TRAC): a prospective, single-blinded, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(10):849–859. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30255-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Alamer A, Melese H, Nigussie F (2020) Effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clinical interventions in aging. 3:1521–1531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25.Heijnen BJ, Speyer R, Baijens LWJ, Bogaardt HCA. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation Versus Traditional Therapy in patients with Poststroke Dysphagia: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(3):336–344e17. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Carnaby-Mann GD, Crary MA, Schmalfuss I, Amdur R. Pharyngocise: Randomized controlled trial of preventative exercises to maintain muscle structure and swallowing function during head-and-neck chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83(4):1145–1159. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.1954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Martín A, Ortega O, Roca M, Arús M, Clavé Civit P. Effect of a minimal-massive intervention in hospitalized older patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia: a proof of concept study. J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22:739–747. doi: 10.1007/s12603-018-1043-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Thomas DR, Ashmen W, Morley JE, Evans WJ. Nutritional management in long-term care: development of a clinical guideline. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2000;55(12):M725–M734. doi: 10.1093/gerona/55.12.M725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dziewas R, Mistry S, Hamdy S, Minnerup J, Van Der Tweel I, Schäbitz W, Bath PM, Investigators PHAST-TRAC. Design and implementation of pharyngeal electrical stimulation for early de-cannulation in TRACheotomized (PHAST-TRAC) Stroke patients with neurogenic dysphagia: a prospective randomized single-blinded interventional study. Int J Stroke. 2017;12(4):430–437. doi: 10.1177/1747493016676618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Steele CM, Bailey GL, Chau T, Molfenter SM, Oshalla M, Waito AA et al The relationship between hyoid and laryngeal displacement and swallowing impairment. Clin Otolaryngol [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 31.Danilov YP, Tyler ME, Kaczmarek KA. Cranial nerve non-invasive neuromodulation (CN-NINM): New approach to neurorehabilitation. Int J Psychophysiol. 2008;3(69):301–302. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.05.299. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Troche MS, Sapienza CM, Rosenbek JC. Effects of bolus consistency on timing and safety of swallow in patients with Parkinson’s Disease. Dysphagia. 2008;23(1):26–32. doi: 10.1007/s00455-007-9090-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.McCullough GH, Rosenbek JC, Wertz RT, Suiter DM, McCoy SC. Utility of clinical swallowing examination measures for detecting aspiration post-stroke. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005;48(6):1280–1293. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/089). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Athukorala RP, Jones RD, Sella O, Huckabee ML. Skill training for swallowing rehabilitation in patients with Parkinson’s Disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(7):1374–1382. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bülow M, Speyer R, Baijens L, Woisard V, Ekberg O. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in Stroke patients with oral and pharyngeal dysfunction. Dysphagia. 2008;23(3):302–309. doi: 10.1007/s00455-007-9145-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Park JW, Oh JC, Lee HJ, Park SJ, Yoon TS, Kwon BS. Effortful swallowing training coupled with electrical stimulation leads to an increase in hyoid elevation during swallowing. Dysphagia. 2009;24(3):296–301. doi: 10.1007/s00455-008-9205-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nair PP, Aghoram R, Thomas B, Bharadwaj B, Chinnakali P. Video teleconsultation services for persons with Epilepsy during COVID-19 pandemic: an exploratory study from public tertiary care hospital in Southern India on feasibility, satisfaction, and effectiveness. Epilepsy Behav. 2021;117:107863. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wang Z, Wang Z, Fang Q, Li H, Zhang L, Liu X. Effect of expiratory muscle strength training on swallowing and cough functions in patients with neurological Diseases: a meta-analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;98(12):1060–1066. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Troche MS, Okun MS, Rosenbek JC, Musson N, Fernandez HH, Rodriguez R, et al. Aspiration and swallowing in Parkinson’s Disease and rehabilitation with EMST: a randomized trial. Neurology. 2010;75(21):1912–1919. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181fef115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wheeler Hegland K, Huber JE, Pitts T, Davenport PW, Sapienza CM. Lung volume measured during sequential swallowing is reduced in patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Chest. 2009;136(2):357–363. [Google Scholar]
- 41.McCabe D, Ashford J, Wheeler-Hegland K, Frymark T, Mullen R, Musson N, Hammond CS, Schooling T (2009) Evidence-based systematic review: Oropharyngeal dysphagia behavioral treatments. Part IV–impact of dysphagia treatment on individuals’ postcancer treatments. J Rehabilitation Res Dev. 46(2) [PubMed]
- 42.Cheng CP, Chan SS, Mak AD, Chan WC, Cheng ST, Shi L, Wang D, Lam LC. Would transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) enhance the effects of working memory training in older adults with mild neurocognitive disorder due to Alzheimer’s Disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16:1–7. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0999-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Dionisio A, Duarte IC, Patricio M, Castelo-Branco M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation as an intervention tool to recover from language, swallowing and attentional deficits after Stroke: a systematic review. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;46(3–4):176–183. doi: 10.1159/000494213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zart P, Levy DS, de Paula Bolzan G, Mancopes R, da Silva AM. Cryostimulation improves recovery from oropharyngeal dysphagia after Stroke. Int Archives Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;17(01):031–40. doi: 10.7162/S1809-97772013000100006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Carnaby-Mann G, Crary MA, Schmalfuss I, Amdur R. Pharyngocise: Randomized Controlled Trial of Preventative exercises to maintain muscle structure and swallowing function during Head-and-Neck Chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83(4):1145–1159. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.1954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Robbins J, Kays SA, Gangnon RE, Hind JA, Hewitt AL, Gentry LR, Taylor AJ. The effects of lingual exercise in Stroke patients with dysphagia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(2):150–158. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ball SL, Panter SG, Redley M, Proctor CA, Byrne K, Clare IC, Holland AJ. The extent and nature of need for mealtime support among adults with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012;56(4):382–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01488.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Carnaby-Mann GD, Crary MA. McNeill dysphagia therapy program: a case-control study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(5):743–749. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Daniels SK, McAdam CP, Brailey K, Foundas AL. Clinical assessment of swallowing and prediction of dysphagia severity. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1997;6(4):17–24. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360.0604.17. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
