Table 2.
Issues of availability and functionality of electronic fetal monitoring equipment
| Category | Problem | Consequence |
| Technical features | Difficulties in getting and keeping a good signal | Midwives holding the electrode in place (thus diverting resources from other tasks), or asking the mother to keep the electrode in place (limiting her movements) |
| Wireless monitors picking up signals from other monitors | Risk of inaccurate appreciation of the situation | |
| Electrode battery not lasting long enough | Time-consuming efforts to find alternatives, risk of delays in monitoring | |
| Showing up mother’s heart rate instead of fetus’s | Risk of inaccurate appreciation of the situation | |
| Human-machine interface | Inadvertently change printing speed | Risk of misinterpreting the trace |
| Inadvertently switching off the monitor | Loss of time and data | |
| Different grids on screen and on paper | Risk of misinterpreting the trace | |
| Supplies | Missing parts (eg, leads for fetal scalp electrodes) | Time-consuming efforts to find alternatives, risk of delays in monitoring |
| Missing consumables (eg, paper) | Time-consuming efforts to find consumables, risk of delays in monitoring | |
| Procurement | Different machines in a unit printing in different colours or scales | Risk of misinterpreting the trace |
| Insufficient number of monitors | Time-consuming efforts to find equipment, risk of delays in monitoring | |
| Maintenance and set-up | Paper jamming | Loss of time and data, delays or interruption to monitoring |
| Wrong time or date | Wrong timeline when reviewing the trace | |
| Physical layout | Bulky monitors in small rooms | Cramped workspaces |