Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 9;33(4):246–256. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016144

Table 2.

Issues of availability and functionality of electronic fetal monitoring equipment

Category Problem Consequence
Technical features Difficulties in getting and keeping a good signal Midwives holding the electrode in place (thus diverting resources from other tasks), or asking the mother to keep the electrode in place (limiting her movements)
Wireless monitors picking up signals from other monitors Risk of inaccurate appreciation of the situation
Electrode battery not lasting long enough Time-consuming efforts to find alternatives, risk of delays in monitoring
Showing up mother’s heart rate instead of fetus’s Risk of inaccurate appreciation of the situation
Human-machine interface Inadvertently change printing speed Risk of misinterpreting the trace
Inadvertently switching off the monitor Loss of time and data
Different grids on screen and on paper Risk of misinterpreting the trace
Supplies Missing parts (eg, leads for fetal scalp electrodes) Time-consuming efforts to find alternatives, risk of delays in monitoring
Missing consumables (eg, paper) Time-consuming efforts to find consumables, risk of delays in monitoring
Procurement Different machines in a unit printing in different colours or scales Risk of misinterpreting the trace
Insufficient number of monitors Time-consuming efforts to find equipment, risk of delays in monitoring
Maintenance and set-up Paper jamming Loss of time and data, delays or interruption to monitoring
Wrong time or date Wrong timeline when reviewing the trace
Physical layout Bulky monitors in small rooms Cramped workspaces