Table 3.

Hierarchical Linear Model: (A) Linear associations between the analytic decisions and the Session 1 between-run median ICC, MSBS and MSWS from suprathreshold mask and (B) the impact of the analytic category on the marginal R².

A. HLM Estimates for Supra-threshold Mask
	Median ICC					Median MSBS				Median MSWS
Predictors		b	CI		p	b	CI		p	b	CI		p
(Intercept)		.23	.19 – .27		<.001	1.40	1.07 – 1.73		<.001	.81	.64 – .99		<.001
Reference [3.6]
fwhm [4.8]		.02	.01 – .04		.004	−.28	−.37 – −.19		<.001	−.21	−.26 – −.17		<.001
fwhm [6.0]		.04	.03 – .06		<.001	−.45	−.54 – −.36		<.001	−.34	−.38 – −.30		<.001
fwhm [7.2]		.05	.04 – .07		<.001	−.56	−.65 – −.47		<.001	−.41	−.46 – −.37		<.001
fwhm [8.4]		.07	.05 – .08		<.001	−.63	−.72 – −.54		<.001	−.46	−.51 – −.42		<.001
Reference [opt1]
motion [opt2]		−.02	−.03 – −.01		.005	−.15	−.23 – −.07		<.001	−.07	−.10 – −.03		.001
motion [opt3]		−.05	−.07 – −.04		<.001	−.38	−.46 – −.29		<.001	−.16	−.19 – −.12		<.001
motion [opt4]		−.05	−.07 – −.04		<.001	−.38	−.46 – −.30		<.001	−.16	−.20 – −.12		<.001
Reference [AntMod]
model [CueMod]		.11	.10 – .12		<.001	.57	.50 – .64		<.001	.24	.20 – .27		<.001
model [FixMod]		.05	.04 – .06		<.001	.50	.43 – .57		<.001	.25	.22 – .28		<.001
Reference [LgainBase]
con [LgainNeut]		−.17	−.19 – −.16		<.001	−.75	−.84 – −.67		<.001	−.28	−.32 – −.24		<.001
con [SgainBase]		−.02	−.04 – −.01		.001	−.04	−.12 – .04		.317	.00	−.03 – .04		.863
con [SgainNeut]		−.23	−.24 – −.22		<.001	−.82	−.90 – −.74		<.001	−.30	−.34 – −.27		<.001
B. Analytic Category Model Impact
Comparison		χ2	Orig R2	New R2	∆R2	χ2	Orig R2	New R2	∆R2	χ2	Orig R2	New R2	∆R2
[Full] vs [New - fwhm]		87	.72	.69	.03	203	.55	.46	.09	438	.55	.32	.23
[Full] vs [New - motion]		85	.72	.69	.03	110	.55	.50	.05	89	.55	.51	.04
[Full] vs [New - model]		275	.72	.60	.12	250	.55	.43	.12	240	.55	.44	.11
[Full] vs [New - con]		851	.72	.17	.55	479	.55	.27	.28	362	.55	.37	.18