Table 4.
Hierarchical Linear Model: (A) Linear associations between the analytic decisions and the Jaccard and Spearman supra-threshold mask Session 1 between-run similarity and (B) the impact of the analytic category on the marginal R2.
| A. HLM Group-map Estimates | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaccard | Spearman | |||||||
| Predictors | b | CI | p | b | CI | p | ||
| (Intercept) | .20 | .09 – .31 | <.001 | .76 | .69 – .83 | <.001 | ||
| Reference [3.6] | ||||||||
| fwhm [4.8] | .03 | .01 – .05 | .004 | .05 | .04 – .07 | <.001 | ||
| fwhm [6.0] | .05 | .03 – .07 | <.001 | .09 | .07 – .10 | <.001 | ||
| fwhm [7.2] | .07 | .05 – .09 | <.001 | .11 | .10 – .13 | <.001 | ||
| fwhm [8.4] | .08 | .06 – .10 | <.001 | .13 | .12 – .15 | <.001 | ||
| Reference [opt1] | ||||||||
| motion [opt2] | .01 | −.00 – .03 | .13 | .01 | −.00 – .03 | .05 | ||
| motion [opt3] | .00 | −.02 – .02 | .85 | .01 | −.00 – .02 | .20 | ||
| motion [opt4] | .00 | −.01 – .02 | .69 | .01 | −.00 – .03 | .08 | ||
| Reference [AntMod] | ||||||||
| model [CueMod] | .05 | .04 – .07 | <.001 | .02 | .01 – .03 | <.001 | ||
| model [FixMod] | .08 | .07 – .10 | <.001 | .01 | −.00 – .02 | .18 | ||
| Reference [LgainBase] | ||||||||
| con [LgainNeut] | −.09 | −.10 – −.07 | <.001 | −.20 | −.21 – −.18 | <.001 | ||
| con [SgainBase] | −.03 | −.05 – −.01 | .001 | −.01 | −.02 – .00 | .17 | ||
| con [SgainNeut] | −.18 | −.20 – −.16 | <.001 | −.34 | −.35 – −.32 | <.001 | ||
| B. Analytic Category Model Impact | ||||||||
| Comparison | χ2 | Orig R2 | New R2 | ∆R2 | χ2 | Orig R2 | New R2 | ∆R2 |
|
| ||||||||
| [Full] vs [New - fwhm] | 78 | .30 | .26 | .04 | 292 | .74 | .66 | .08 |
| [Full] vs [New - motion] | 3 | .30 | .30 | .00 | 5 | .74 | .74 | .00 |
| [Full] vs [New - model] | 104 | .30 | .25 | .05 | 14 | .74 | .73 | .01 |
| [Full] vs [New - con] | 348 | .30 | .09 | .21 | 1205 | .74 | .08 | .66 |