TABLE 4.
Model 1 a | Model 2 b | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Inc. MCI or AD vs. CU | B c |
95% CI Lower Upper |
P c | B c |
95% CI Lower Upper |
P c | ||
P‐tau181 | 0.004 | −0.002 | 0.010 | 0.202 | 0.005 | −0.002 | 0.011 | 0.156 |
NfL | 0.002 | −0.003 | 0.007 | 0.368 | 0.002 | −0.004 | 0.007 | 0.575 |
GFAP | 0.003 | −0.002 | 0.008 | 0.258 | 0.003 | −0.003 | 0.008 | 0.335 |
Aβ42/Aβ40 | −0.003 | −0.006 | 0.000 | 0.080 | −0.004 | −0.007 | 0.000 | 0.055 |
P‐tau181/AB42 | 0.003 | −0.003 | 0.010 | 0.343 | 0.003 | −0.004 | 0.010 | 0.358 |
PCA1 | 0.022 | 0.001 | 0.043 | 0.040 | 0.016 | −0.007 | 0.039 | 0.181 |
PCA2 | −0.032 | −0.055 | −0.009 | 0.007 | −0.036 | −0.062 | −0.011 | 0.005 |
Inc. dem vs. CU | B |
95% CI Lower Upper |
P | B |
95% CI Lower Upper |
P | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P‐tau181 | 0.0004 | −0.008 | 0.009 | 0.919 | −0.001 | −0.009 | 0.007 | 0.832 |
NfL | 0.003 | −0.007 | 0.012 | 0.569 | 0.001 | −0.010 | 0.011 | 0.903 |
GFAP | 0.006 | −0.002 | 0.014 | 0.151 | 0.005 | −0.004 | 0.014 | 0.266 |
Aβ42/Aβ40 | −0.003 | −0.007 | 0.002 | 0.263 | −0.002 | −0.008 | 0.003 | 0.358 |
P‐tau181/AB42 | −0.005 | −0.016 | 0.006 | 0.372 | −0.005 | −0.018 | 0.008 | 0.416 |
PCA1 | 0.013 | −0.024 | 0.050 | 0.498 | 0.002 | −0.040 | 0.045 | 0.910 |
PCA2 | −0.028 | −0.063 | 0.007 | 0.119 | −0.027 | −0.068 | 0.014 | 0.200 |
Inc. MCI vs. CU | B |
95% CI Lower Upper |
P | B |
95% CI Lower Upper |
P | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P‐tau181 | 0.005 | −0.002 | 0.012 | 0.159 | 0.006 | −0.001 | 0.014 | 0.087 |
NfL | 0.002 | −0.003 | 0.008 | 0.439 | 0.002 | −0.004 | 0.008 | 0.537 |
GFAP | 0.002 | −0.004 | 0.008 | 0.479 | 0.002 | −0.004 | 0.008 | 0.508 |
Aβ42/Aβ40 | −0.003 | −0.006 | 0.001 | 0.109 | −0.004 | −0.008 | 0.000 | 0.055 |
P‐tau181/AB42 | 0.006 | −0.001 | 0.012 | 0.114 | 0.006 | −0.001 | 0.013 | 0.105 |
PCA1 | 0.025 | 0.002 | 0.047 | 0.033 | 0.020 | −0.005 | 0.044 | 0.115 |
PCA2 | −0.033 | −0.058 | −0.008 | 0.010 | −0.039 | −0.067 | −0.012 | 0.005 |
Notes: PCA1 and PCA2 were derived from principal component analysis (PCA) using log‐transformed values of Aβ42/Aβ40, p‐tau181/Aβ42, NfL, and GFAP, with PCA1 having positive loadings on p‐tau181/Aβ42, NfL, GFAP, and PCA2 having positive loading on Aβ42/Aβ40 and negative loading on p‐tau181/Aβ42.
Abbreviations: Aβ, amyloid beta; APOE, apolipoprotein E; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CU, cognitively unimpaired; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; NfL, neurofilament light chain; p‐tau181, phosphorylated tau‐181.
Model 1: adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education.
Model 2: adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, APOE ε4, Charlson Comorbidity Index.
B values in the table indicate the beta coefficient for the interaction between the disease status x time, with time being the duration (years) between the first blood visit to the follow‐up blood visits. Significant interactions indicate the rate of biomarker change over time in incident MCI and/or AD patients differ from the rate in cognitive unimpaired (CU) participants.