Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 12;20(3):2072–2079. doi: 10.1002/alz.13664

TABLE 3.

Plasma marker measures, comparing cognitive impairment categories, among American Indian participants of the Strong Heart Study (2017–2019).

Comparing dementia, versus cognitive intact

Cognitive intact

N = 181 45.6%

MCI

N = 140 35.3%

Dementia

N = 41 10.3%

In‐MCI

N = 35 8.8%

Empirical, optimal cut point ROC (AUC, sensitivity, specificity) at cut point
pTau181 pg/mL 7.6 (17.3) 6.8 (4.7) 10.2 (18.4) 6.6 (4.3) >4.5 0.66 (0.78, 0.53)
40 pg/mL 140.1 (43.6) 143.9 (45.3) 155.8 (41.7) 143.7 (49.0) <135.5 0.63 (0.61, 0.65)
42 pg/mL 8.2 (2.9) 8.5 (2.9) 8.8 (2.3) 8.3 (2.5) <7.9 0.60 (0.71, 0.49)
42/40 ratio 0.059 (0.014) 0.059 (0.014) 0.057 (0.009) 0.060 (0.013) >0.06 0.46 (0.51, 0.42)
GFAP pg/mL 162.2 (80.9) 175.9 (88.0) 216.2 (88.6) 186.5 (125.3) >199 0.73 (0.68, 0.78)
NfL pg/mL 34.9 (21.3) 42.4 (28.7) 53.7 (31.1) 43.7 (30.9) >32.7 0.69 (0.73, 0.64)

Note: Values provided as mean (SD) unless otherwise indicated. Cutpoints and ROC comparisons with major risk factors: age (> 75 years, AUC 0.61), sex (male, AUC 0.54), education (< 13, AUC 0.33), APOE (e4 carrier, AUC 0.59). Statistical tests by Kruskal–Wallis test across cognitive categories, with FDR (false discovery rate) Q‐value estimated by Benjamini–Hochberg method, assessed for significance at Q < 0.1: pTau181 Q < 0.001; Ab40 Q = 0.192; Ab42 Q = 0.420; Ab4240 Q = 0.420; GFAP Q = 0.006, NFL Q < 0.001.