Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 21;16(4):830–841. doi: 10.1111/os.13973

TABLE 3.

Comparison of radiographic and clinical assessment between patients with or without DJF

Patients with DJF (n = 13) Patients without DJF (n = 65) p‐value
Age (years) 66.9 ± 5.3 60.8 ± 6.1 0.001*
Gender (F/M) 9/4 53/12 0.531
Body mass index (kg/m2) 26.5 ± 4.1 25.0 ± 3.4 0.168
BMD T‐value −2.9 ± 1.6 −2.5 ± 1.6 0.460
CT HU 90.2 ± 57.0 116.6 ± 41.9 0.039*
Osteoporosis (Y/N) 9/4 33/32 0.223
Hypertension 2/11 20/45 0.330
Diabetes 2/11 3/62 0.192
Other complications 1.1 ± 1.6 1.0 ± 1.2 0.966
Fusion levels 5.2 ± 1.7 5.2 ± 1.9 0.914
Follow‐up (months) 56.3 ± 20.6 34.8 ± 12.5 0.010*
Osteotomy
PCO 2 7 0.670
Grade 3/4 11 58
LIV
OV + 2 3 19 0.649
OV + 3 8 28
OV+ more than 3 levels 2 18
Operation time (minutes) 286.00 ± 68.18 256.83 ± 70.63 0.176
Estimated blood loss (mL) 1546.15 ± 1022.75 896.92 ± 511.35 0.043*
TK (°)
Preoperatively 37.7 ± 17.1 37.4± 17.6 0.953
Postoperatively 30.5 ± 14.1 27.7± 19.7 0.641
At final follow‐up 29.4 ± 14.9 29.9± 11.9 0.907
p‐value 0.222 0.010*
GK (°)
Preoperatively 62.5 ± 20.9 59.5 ± 16.5 0.566
Postoperatively 17.3 ± 9.5 20.6 ± 12.2 0.365
At final follow‐up 20.9 ± 13.4 21.1 ± 12.0 0.968
p‐value <0.001* <0.001*
Correction rate of GK (%) 73.2± 11.2 66.4 ± 18.3 0.204
TLK (°)
Preoperatively 38.0 ± 17.1 45.1 ± 15.5 0.143
Postoperatively 14.7 ± 13.8 11.7 ± 9.7 0.473
At final follow‐up 14.9 ± 12.9 13.5 ± 8.8 0.652
Change in TLK 24.1 ± 16.3 31.9 ± 17.6 0.149
p‐value <0.001* <0.001*
LL (°)
Preoperatively 34.9 ± 19.0 33.1 ± 22.6 0.806
Postoperatively 36.7 ± 14.6 40.2 ± 18.7 0.531
At final follow‐up 35.9 ± 15.61 37.3 ± 14.0 0.472
p‐value 0.891 0.244
PI (°)
Preoperatively 51.1 ± 5.9 50.2 ± 12.1 0.711
Postoperatively 51.1 ± 6.0 52.0 ± 12.5 0.810
At final follow‐up 50.9 ± 6.1 49.5 ± 12.7 0.609
PT (°)
Preoperatively 30.2 ± 5.8 29.1 ± 11.0 0.618
Postoperatively 20.4 ± 4.7 21.8 ± 8.9 0.635
At final follow‐up 20.0 ± 3.1 22.1 ± 9.8 0.255
SS (°)
Preoperatively 20.9 ± 3.6 21.1 ± 7.7 0.865
Postoperatively 30.7 ± 4.4 30.3 ± 12.2 0.918
At final follow‐up 30.9 ± 5.5 27.5 ± 10.2 0.345
SVA (mm)
Preoperatively 77.5 ± 55.0 36.3 ± 40.0 0.004*
Postoperatively 36.0 ± 20.5 25.6 ± 28.7 0.243
At final follow‐up 38.6 ± 23.0 28.5 ± 29.0 0.263
p‐value 0.040* 0.031*
Change in SVA 38.9 ± 50.8 7.8 ± 36.3 0.016*
T1PA (°)
Preoperatively 30.3 ± 18.7 30.0 ± 16.6 0.964
Postoperatively 24.0 ± 9.6 18.3 ± 10.1 0.085
At final follow‐up 24.3 ± 11.3 19.8 ± 12.5 0.279
p‐value 0.370 <0.001*
LIV‐PSVL (mm)
Preoperatively −6.9 ± 33.1 −5.3 ± 20.2 0.877
Postoperatively 11.0 ± 28.9 14.5 ± 17.8 0.591
At final follow‐up 10.6 ± 23.9 11.1 ± 18.4 0.937
p‐value 0.196 <0.001*
ODI
Preoperatively 44.3 ± 15.3 42.4 ± 17.9 0.725
At final follow‐up 15.4 ± 10.1 8.5 ± 7.9 0.008*
p‐value <0.001* <0.001*
JOA
Preoperatively 16.5 ± 2.4 17.9 ± 4.9 0.137
At final follow‐up 24.5 ± 2.7 26.7 ± 2.1 0.016*
p‐value <0.001* <0.001*
VAS (back)
Preoperatively 7.2 ± 1.7 5.9 ± 1.8 0.020*
At final follow‐up 1.5 ± 1.5 0.5 ± 1.0 0.043*
p‐value <0.001* <0.001*
VAS (leg)
Preoperatively 1.2 ± 1.9 1.4 ± 2.4 0.674
Postoperatively 0.2 ± 0.6 0.1 ± 0.5 0.671
p‐value 0.020* <0.001*

Note: Boldface values indicate p < 0.05.

Abbreviations: BMD, bone mineral density; DJF, distal junction failure; GK, general kyphosis; Grade 3/4, pedicle subtraction osteotomy and modified grade 4 osteotomy; JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association; LIV, lowest instrumented vertebrae; LIV‐PSVL, the distance from the center of the LIV to the posterior sacral vertical line; LL, lumbar lordosis; ODI, Oswestry disability index; OV, osteotomized vertebrae; PCO, posterior column osteotomy; PI, pelvic incidence; PT, pelvic tilt; SS, sacral slope; SVA, sagittal vertical axis; T1PA, T1 pelvic angle; TK, thoracic kyphosis; TLK, thoracolumbar kyphosis; VAS, visual analogue scale.