. 2024 Apr 1;14:7685. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58235-z

Table 6.

Comparison of the permeability coefficient calculated by the two methods of flow velocity monitoring and pumping test.

Well number	Velocity $v$	Fissure ratio $n$	Hydraulic gradient $d h / d l$	Permeability coefficient $k$		Ratio $k_{1} : k_{2}$	Reliability
	Velocity $v$	Fissure ratio $n$	Hydraulic gradient $d h / d l$	Monitoring $k_{1}$	Pump test $k_{2}$
	m/day	%	%	m/day	m/day
DR01	16.14	0.06	3.93	0.26	0.25	1.04	Most credible
ZK106	21.45	0.29	8.56	0.73	0.08	9.16	Less credible
HT35	32.73	0.60	1.60	12.26	0.97	12.62	More credible
PH33	35.68	17.82	2.66	238.86	5.36	44.57	More credible
ZK01	27.67	0.31	0.62	13.80	0.08	172.5	Less credible