Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 23;403(10432):1164–1175. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02844-1

Table 4.

Solicited and unsolicited safety events in infants and young children

Infants receiving nOPV2
Infants receiving bOPV
Young children receiving nOPV2
Young children receiving bOPV
Number of events* n/N (%) 95% CI Number of events* n/N (%) 95% CI p value Number of events* n/N (%) 95% CI Number of events* n/N (%) 95% CI
Any solicited adverse event within 7 days of vaccination
Any severity 456 273/682 (40%) 36–44 80 47/102 (46%) 36–56 .. 149 98/300 (33%) 27–38 153 98/300 (33%) 27–38
Severe 0 0/682 (0%) 0–1 1 1/102 (1%) 0–5 .. 4 4/300 (1%) <1–3 2 2/300 (<1%) <1–2
Unsolicited adverse event to 28 days of last vaccination
Any severity 1094 837/2007§ (42%) 40–44 197 161/338§ (48%) 42–53 p=0·043 248 166/300§ (55%) 50–61 248 172/300§ (57%) 52–63
Severe 4 4/2007§ (<1%) 0–1 2 2/338§ (<1%) 0–2 .. 0 0/300§ (0%) 0–1 1 1/300§ (<1%)0–1
Related unsolicited adverse event to 28 days of last dose
Any severity 14 14/2007§ (<1%) 0–1 3 3/338§ (<1%) 0–3 .. 0 0/300§ (0%) 0–1 0 0/300§ (0%) 0–1
Severe 0 0/2007§ (0%) 0–0 0 0/338§ (0%) 0–1 .. 0 0/300§ (0%) 0–1 0 0/300§ (0%) 0–1
Serious adverse events 18 17/2007§ (<1%) <1–1 5 5/338§ (2%) 1–3 .. 1 1/300§ (0%) 0–2 4 4/300§ (1%) 0–3
Related serious adverse events 0 0/2007§ (0%) 0–0 0 0/338§ (0%)0–1 .. 0 0/300§ (0%) 0–1 1 1/300§ (0%) 0–2

95% CIs calculated using the exact Clopper-Pearson method. bOPV=bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine. nOPV2=novel type 2 oral poliovirus vaccine.

*

Number of participants included in the analysis of the given population (reactogenicity or safety).

Fever (axillary temperature >37·5°C), vomiting, diarrhoea, irritability, decreased feeding, and decreased activity (including immediate solicited events occurring at 30 min post-dose in the reactogenicity population).

Reactogenicity population.

§

Safety population.

Fisher's exact two-tailed test of the rate of events between nOPV2 and bOPV. No other difference in event rates between nOPV2 and bOPV within the age cohorts was significant at the 5% significance level.