Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 20;1(1):qxad005. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad005

Table 2.

Payers’ concerns about MCED testing and which concerns would preclude coverage if unaddressed.

Concern Percent (n/N) of payers expressing this concern (N = 19) Percent (n/N) of payers for whom this concern would preclude coverage if unaddressed (N = 19)
Test performance
 Rate of false-negatives is too high 74 (14/19) 53 (10/19)
 Rate of false-positives is too high 32 (6/19) 26 (5/19)
Inclusion of cancers
 Inclusion of indolent cancers will lead to  overtreatment 47 (9/19) 47 (9/19)
 Inclusion of cancers where early diagnosis does  not lead to improved outcomes 74 (14/19) 74 (14/19)
Clinical integration
 No protocols for uncertain scenarios where  cancer is not confirmed 79 (15/19) 53 (10/19)
 No protocol for testing frequency 21 (4/19) 11 (2/19)
 Difficulty implementing in clinical care 47 (9/19) 0
Costs
 Costs of test 26 (5/19) 11 (2/19)
 Cost of downstream diagnostics and care 63 (12/19) 26 (5/19)
Other concerns
 Lack of FDA approval 11 (2/19) 11 (2/19)
 Lack of coverage recommendation from  BlueCross/Blue Shield Association 11 (2/19) 11 (2/19)

Note: Numbers in cells do not amount to 100% as some payers expressed multiple concerns. FDA = Food and Drug Administration; MCED = multicancer early-detection.