Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 20;1(1):qxad005. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad005

Table 3.

Types of evidence for MCED outcomes that payers need for coverage considerations and which types would be decisive factors in coverage decisions.

Evidence categories and types of evidence Percent (n/N) of payers who will need this evidence for coverage decisionsa (N = 19) Percent (n/N) of payers for whom this evidence will be a decisive factor in coverage decisionsb (N = 19)
Screening endpoints
 Uptake of MCED 26 (5/19) 0
 Changes in adherence to recommended screening as a result of using MCED 21 (4/19) 0
Diagnosis endpoints
 Impact on stage at diagnosis 84 (16/19) 16 (3/19)
 Number to screen to get one cancer diagnosis 21 (4/19) 0
 NPV, PPV 26 (5/19) 0
Clinical care endpoints
 Survival 42 (8/19) 42 (8/19)
  Net clinical outcome: survival and harms from increased morbidity and/or treatment toxicity 21 (4/19) 21 (4/19)
  Survival only 21 (4/19) 21 (4/19)
 Reduction in disease morbidity and/or treatment toxicity 37 (7/19) 37 (7/19)
 Impact on patient anxiety 26 (5/19) 0
Healthcare factors
 Cost 47 (9/19) 5 (1/19)
 Patient and clinician satisfaction 11 (2/19) 0

Note: MCED = multicancer early-detection; NPV = negative predictive value; PPV = positive predictive value.

a

This column does not amount to 100% as some payers noted the need for multiple types of evidence.

b

This column amounts to 100% as each payer named one type of evidence that would be decisive for coverage.