Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 20;1(1):qxad005. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad005

Table 4.

MCED evidence study design/methods acceptable by payers.

Study design feature Percent (n/N) of payers who would accept a study with this feature for consideration in coverage decision for MCED testing (N = 19)
RCT vs. an RWE study
 Data from rigorous RWE will be acceptable 63 (12/19)
  RWE alone 47 (9/19)
  RWE with a smaller non-phase III RCT 16 (3/19)
 RCT is needed 37 (7/19)
Data modeling methods
 Modeling complementing study data may be considered 47 (9/19)
  Could be used to strengthen the data from trials 26 (5/19)
  Could help extrapolate study results to additional cancers or populations 21 (4/19)
 Modeling would not be considered in coverage decisions 53 (10/19)
Populations to study
 Start with high- or elevated-risk population 42 (8/19)
 Need to test in the populations intended for the use of MCED tests 58 (11/19)
How evidence will be evaluated
 Individually for each cancer included in a test 79 (15/19)
 In aggregate for all cancers included in a test 21 (4/19)

Note: MCED = multicancer early-detection; RCT = randomized controlled trial; RWE = real-world evidence.