Table 4.
Study design feature | Percent (n/N) of payers who would accept a study with this feature for consideration in coverage decision for MCED testing (N = 19) |
---|---|
RCT vs. an RWE study | |
Data from rigorous RWE will be acceptable | 63 (12/19) |
RWE alone | 47 (9/19) |
RWE with a smaller non-phase III RCT | 16 (3/19) |
RCT is needed | 37 (7/19) |
Data modeling methods | |
Modeling complementing study data may be considered | 47 (9/19) |
Could be used to strengthen the data from trials | 26 (5/19) |
Could help extrapolate study results to additional cancers or populations | 21 (4/19) |
Modeling would not be considered in coverage decisions | 53 (10/19) |
Populations to study | |
Start with high- or elevated-risk population | 42 (8/19) |
Need to test in the populations intended for the use of MCED tests | 58 (11/19) |
How evidence will be evaluated | |
Individually for each cancer included in a test | 79 (15/19) |
In aggregate for all cancers included in a test | 21 (4/19) |
Note: MCED = multicancer early-detection; RCT = randomized controlled trial; RWE = real-world evidence.