Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 21;2(1):qxad084. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad084

Table 2.

Associations of government perceptions, welfare stigma, and discrimination with safety-net program participation/receipt.a,b

OR (95% CI)
SNAP participants
vs nonparticipants
EITC recipients
vs nonrecipients
Government perceptions
 Principal component 1: More expansive role of government 0.89 (0.78, 1.02) 1.08 (0.86, 1.35)
 Principal component 2: Positive perception of government 1.01 (0.86, 1.18) 0.87 (0.67, 1.13)
Welfare stigma
 Principal component 1: Program stigma 1.01 (0.91, 1.11) 1.06 (0.91, 1.24)
 Principal component 2: Social stigma 1.24* (1.05, 1.47) 1.39* (1.05, 1.84)
Discrimination
 Principal component 1: Frequent experiences of discrimination 1.14 (1.00, 1.29) 0.96 (0.79, 1.17)

aModels adjusted for participant characteristics (ie, age, gender, race and ethnicity, education, marital status), reduction in income during COVID-19 pandemic, household income, number of children in the household, food insecurity, and participation in WIC. *P < .05.

bn ranges from 467 to 476 for SNAP participants and from 310 to 317 for EITC participants, depending on model.

Abbreviations: EITC, Earned Income Tax Credit; OR, odds ratio; SNAP, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; WIC, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.