Table 3.
Characteristics of the included studies.
| Study/Country | Participants (Intervention group/Control Group) |
Intervention | Assessments Timepoints /Outcomes | Findings | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample size | Mean age | Sex, men % | ||||
| Bahraseman et al. 2021 [41]/Iran | 31/31 Attrition rate 3.3% | 46.0 ± 2.0/49.4 ± 1.9 | 30(50%) | Components
Intervention providers: RN with MS Delivery mode: face to face/group Dose: 90/ session, twice a week, for four weeks Setting: dialysis centers Control: usual care |
Pre-post-1m Coping strategy use (CSS) Self-efficacy (GSES) | Patients in the intervention group got more improvements in coping strategy use (effect size = 1.70, t = 6.27, p < 0.001) and self-efficacy (effect size = 2.48, t = 11.9, p < 0.001) compared with patients in the control group. |
| Chan et al. 2022 [42]/China | 40/41 Attrition rate 6.2% | 68.4 ± 8.7/65.0 ± 11.0 | 42 (58.3%) | Components
Theory/Model: theory of hope Intervention providers: renal nurse specialists Delivery mode: face-to-face, telephone or video call/individual Dose: two 60-minute sessions and two 30-minute sessions, once a week, for 4 weeks Setting: the nephrology unit Control: routine care |
Pre-post-4w Quality of life (KDQOL-36) | Patients in the intervention group got more improvements in the effects of kidney disease (Wald χ2 = 8.324, p = 0.004) and mental component summary (Wald χ2 = 6.763, p = 0.009). |
| Chen et al. 2021 [18]/ Singapore | 77/77 | 59.7 ± 12.4 /62.0 ± 13.7 | 72(58.1%) | Components
Theory/Model: Bandura’s self-efficacy theory Intervention providers: RN with PhD Delivery mode: face-to-face/individual Dose: 90 min/session, twice a week, for one week Setting: dialysis centers Control: routine care |
Pre-1m-3m-6m Self-care self-efficacy (DSSS) Anxiety and depression (HADS) Treatment adherence (RAAQ and RABQ) HRQoL (KDQoL™-36) |
Patients in the intervention group got more improvements in anxiety (effect size = -o.41, F = 3.001, p = 0.040) and depression (effect size = −0.42, F = 5.170, p = 0.003) compared with patients in the control group. No significant effects were found in other outcomes. |
| Cukor et al. 2014 [43]/America | 38/27 BDI ≥ 10 Attrition rate 9.2% | NI | 18 (27.3%) | Components
Theory/Model: none Intervention providers: a doctoral-level psychologist and two doctoral-level trainees under the supervision Delivery mode: face-to-face/individual Dose: 60 min/session, once a week, for three months Setting: dialysis centers Control: usual care |
Pre-post-3m Depression (BDI-II and HAM-D) Quality of life (KDQOL) | Patients in the intervention group got more improvements in depression (effect size = −0.17, t = 1.29, p < 0.05) and quality of life (effect size = 0.16, t = 0.21, p = 0.04) compared with patients in the control group. |
| Durmuş et al. 2021 [44]/ Turkey | 43/43 Attrition rate 17.4% | 56.1 ± 12.7 | 43(60.1%) | Components
Intervention providers: NI Delivery mode: face-to-face/individual Dose: 20–30min/session, twice a week, for eight weeks Setting: dialysis centers Control: standard treatment |
Pre-post Anxiety and depression (HADS) | Patients in the intervention group got more improvements in anxiety (effect size = −0.94, t = 6.70, p = 0.000) and depression (effect size = −0.80, t = 4.88, p = 0.001) compared with patients in the control group. |
| Erdley et al. 2014 [38]/America | 17/18 Attrition rate 5.7% | 72.3 ± 5.6 73.5 ± 8.3 | 21(65.6%) | Components
Theory/Model: none Intervention providers: nephrologist Delivery mode: face-to-face/group Dose: 60 min/session, once a week, for six weeks Setting: hospital Control: routine care |
Pre-post Depression (BDI and PHQ-9) | Patients in the intervention group got more improvements in depression (effect size = −0.97, t = 2.15, p < 0.05) compared with patients in the control group. |
| Espahbodi et al. 2015 [36]/ Iran | 30/30 | 49.1 ± 14.552.3 ± 15.6 | 27(45%) | Components
Theory/Model: none Intervention providers: a nephrologist and a psychiatrist Delivery mode: face-to-face/group Dose: 60 min/session, once every other day, for one week Setting: dialysis centers Control: routine care |
Pre-1m Anxiety and depression (HADS) |
No significant effects were found in depression and anxiety. |
| He, 2008 [37]/China | 16/16 | 49.5 ± 15.3 | 19(59.4%) | Components
Theory/Model: Ellis ABC theory Intervention providers: RN with MS Delivery mode: face-to-face/group Dose: 90 min/session, once a week, for twelve weeks Setting: dialysis centers Control: routine care |
Pre-post Stress (HSS) Depression (SDS) Anxiety (SAS) Mental health (SCL-90) Quality of life (SF-36) |
Patients in the intervention group got more improvements in stress (effect size = −0.88, t = −3.19, p = 0.003), depression (effect size = −0.24, t = −0.21, p = 0.045), anxiety (effect size = −0.82, t = −2.95, p = 0.006), mental health (effect size = −1.92, t = −3.11, p = 0.003), physiological health of QOL (effect = 1.09, t = 3.76, p = 0.001), and mental health of QOL (effect size = 0.54, t = 2.90, p = 0.007) compared with patients in the control group. |
| Hou et al. 2014 [45]/China | 52/51 | 54.5 ± 13.8 52.4 ± 14.5 | 42(40.8%) | Components
Theory/Model: none Intervention providers: physician Delivery mode: face-to-face/individual Dose: muscle relaxation:30min/session, once two days, after the patients were well trained:60min/session, three times a week, for three months Setting: dialysis centers Control: routine care |
Pre-post Anxiety and depression (SCL-90) Sleep quality (PSQI) |
Patients in the intervention group got more improvements in anxiety (effect size = −1.94, t = 9.46, p = 0.000), depression (effect size = −0.61, t = −4.08, p = 0.000), and sleep quality (effect size = −1.52, t = 8.41, p = 0.000) compared with patients in the control group. |
| Jenkins et al. 2021 [46]/Australia | 42/42 Attrition rate 48.8% | 60.8 ± 10.2 59.8 ± 13.2 | 30 (52.6%) | Components
Theory/Model: self-determination theory Intervention providers: a health professional (e.g., nurse, psychologist) Delivery mode: face-to-face, telephone or video call/individual Dose: 60 min/session, once a week, for eight weeks; plus, a booster session 3 months after session eight Setting: the nephrology unit Control: routine care |
Pre-post-3m-9m Depression and anxiety (HADS) Quality of Life (KDQOL-SF) Self-efficacy (GSE) |
Patients in the intervention group got more improvements in depression (effect size = −1.16, η2 = 0.012, p = 0.012); No significant effects were found in other outcomes. |
| Lerma et al. 2017 [47]/ Mexico | 38/22 | 41.8 ± 14.7 41.7 ± 15.1 |
23(38.3%) | Components
Theory/Model: none Intervention providers: therapist Delivery mode: face-to-face/group Dose: 120 min/session, 5 times a week, for 5 weeks Setting: dialysis centers Control: routine care |
Pre-post-1m Anxiety and depression (BAI and BDI) QOL (Quality of Life Scale scores) |
Patients in the intervention group got more improvements in anxiety (effect size = −0.64, t = 2.80, p < 0.01), depression (effect size = −0.62, t = 3.13, p < 0.01) and quality of life (effect size = 0.64, t = 3.07, p < 0.01) compared with patients in the control group. |
| Saraireh et al. 2018 [40]/Jordan | 65/65 | 52.0 ± 10.7 53.4 ± 8.0 |
55(50%) | Components
Theory/Model: none Intervention providers: RN with PhD Delivery mode: face-to-face/individual Dose: 60 min/session, 7 times, duration and frequency (NI) Setting: dialysis centers Control: CBT |
Pre-post Depression (HADS) |
Patients in the intervention group got more improvements in depression (effect size = −0.74, t = 4.68, p = 0.00) compared with patients in the CBT group. |
| Shareh et al. 2022 [48]/Iran | 58/58 | 43.7 ± 6.4 46.4 ± 7.9 |
68(58.6%) | Components
Theory/Model: none Intervention providers: general practitioner, psychologist and psychotherapist Delivery mode: face-to-face/group (7-9) Dose: 90 min/session, once a week, for nine weeks Setting: dialysis centers Control: received psychoeducation consultation in a group format |
pre-post Sleep Quality (PSQI) Anxiety and depression (BAI and BDI) |
Patients in the intervention group got more improvements in sleep quality (effect size = −0.31, F = 414.98, p = 0.000,#x003B7;2 = 0.79), anxiety (effect size = −0.68, F = 235.70, p = 0.000, η2 = 0.682), depression (effect size = −0.85, F = 176.63, p = 0.000, η2 = 0.616) compared with patients in the control group. |
| Tsay et al. 2005 [39]/China | 33/33 Attrition rate 13.6% |
50.7 ± 14.1 | 27 (46.6%) | Components
Intervention providers: a clinical nurse specialist in nephrology and a clinical psychotherapist Delivery mode: face-to-face/individual + group (11) Dose: 120 min/session, once a week, for eight weeks Setting: center hemodialysis unit Control: routine care |
Pre-3m Perceived stress (HSS) Depression (BDI) uality of life (MOS SF-36) |
Patients in the intervention group got more improvements in depression levels (effect size = −0.68, t = 2.88, p < 0.01) compared with patients in the control group. No significant effects were found in other outcomes. |