Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2024 Feb 27;12(4):e03393-23. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03393-23

Bacteroides fragilis aggravates high-fat diet-induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by regulating lipid metabolism and remodeling gut microbiota

Yumei Huang 1, Jiali Cao 1, Mengpei Zhu 1, Ziwen Wang 1, Ze Jin 1, Zhifan Xiong 1,
Editor: Cheng-Yuan Kao2
PMCID: PMC10986510  PMID: 38411057

ABSTRACT

Gut microbiota dysbiosis is a prominent determinant that significantly contributes to the disruption of lipid metabolism. Consequently, it is essential to the occurrence and development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Nevertheless, the connection between diet and symbiotic gut microbiota in the progression of NAFLD remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to explore the role of supplementing commensal Bacteroides fragilis (B. fragilis) on lipid metabolism, gut microbiota, and metabolites in high-fat diet (HFD)-fed mice, elucidating the impact of gut microbiota and metabolites on the development of NAFLD. Our study revealed that supplementation with B. fragilis exacerbated both weight gain and obesity in mice. B. fragilis exacerbated blood glucose levels and liver dysfunction in mice. Furthermore, an increase in liver lipid accumulation and the upregulation of genes correlated with lipid metabolism were observed in mice. Under an HFD, supplementation of commensal B. fragilis resulted in alterations in the gut microbiota, notably a significant increase in Desulfovibrionaceae, which led to elevated endotoxin levels and thereby influenced the progression of NAFLD. It was interesting that the simultaneous examination of gut microbiota metabolites revealed a more pronounced impact of diet on short-chain fatty acids. This study represented the pioneering investigation into the impact of B. fragilis on NAFLD. Our findings demonstrated that B. fragilis induced dysregulation in the intestinal microbiota, leading to elevated levels of lipopolysaccharide and dysfunction in glucose and lipid metabolism, thereby exacerbating NAFLD.

IMPORTANCE

Some intestinal symbiotic microbes are involved in the occurrence of the metabolic disorders. Our study investigated the impact of supplementing commensal Bacteroides fragilis on host metabolism in high-fat diet-fed mice. Research results indicated that adding a specific bacterial strain to the complex intestinal microecology can worsen metabolic conditions. This effect mainly affects the structural diversity of intestinal microorganisms, the increase in harmful bacteria in the gut, and the elevation of endotoxin levels, blood glucose, and lipid metabolism, thereby impacting the progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Understanding the principles that govern the establishment of microbial communities comprising multiple species is crucial for preventing or repairing dysfunctions in these communities, thereby enhancing host health and facilitating disease treatment. This study demonstrated that gut microbiota dysbiosis could contribute to metabolic dysfunction and provides new insights into how to promote gut microbiota in the prevention and therapy of NAFLD.

KEYWORDS: commensal Bacteroides fragilis, gut microbiota, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, high-fat diet, lipid metabolism, short-chain fatty acids

INTRODUCTION

The composition and functionality of gut microbiota can be influenced by host and dietary factors (1). The imbalance between the commensal and pathogenic microbiota causes dysbiosis of the gastrointestinal microbiota (2, 3). The important role of gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has recently been realized. However, they can also serve as reservoirs for pathogens and produce bioactive molecules that contribute to the pathogenesis of hepatic steatosis (4). Evidence from animal studies indicated that gut microbiota may play a pathogenic role in causing the occurrence of NAFLD (5, 6). Recent evidence has demonstrated the essential role that intestinal dysfunction played in the pathophysiology and etiology of metabolic disorders like type 2 diabetes (T2D), obesity, and NAFLD (7). Gut dysbiosis and alterations in metabolism of gut microbiota have been connected with the severity of NAFLD (8, 9). Zhuge et al. showed that Bacteroides were independently associated with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), while Ruminococcus was significantly linked to fibrosis (6). Therefore, it is necessary to further understand the role of commensal gut microbiota in NAFLD.

Bacteroides fragilis (B. fragilis) is a Gram-negative obligate anaerobe that commensally lives in the lower gastrointestinal tract of mammals and exerts profound effects on host susceptibility to inflammatory disorders (10). Previous studies assigned B. fragilis strains by two subtypes: non-toxigenic B. fragilis (NTBF) strains that cannot produce or release B. fragilis toxin (BFT) and enterotoxigenic B. fragilis (ETBF) strains that carry BFT genes encoding B. fragilis toxin within the bacteria’s pathogenicity islands (BfPAI) (1113). NTBF was reported to enhance the development of mucosal immunity and exert a suppressive effect on colitis, lupus nephritis, and viral encephalitis (1416). Several studies have recently suggested that B. fragilis might have an increasingly significant pathogenic role in metabolic disorders such as diabetes, atherosclerosis, and obesity, demonstrating a causal association between the Enterobacteriaceae and metabolic disorder pathophysiology (1720). Nevertheless, the exact role of NTBF in NAFLD remains uncertain.

Although the role of commensal intestinal B. fragilis in immune system development has been highlighted by animal and in vitro studies, there is a lack of research on the involvement of commensal B. fragilis in metabolic diseases (21). This study represented the first investigation into the impact of B. fragilis on the microbiome composition in NAFLD. We hypothesized that B. fragilis could cause the change of gut microbiota, influencing the occurrence of NAFLD. To more accurately replicate clinical circumstances, we first used an HFD-induced NAFLD model to study the effect of B. fragilis on NAFLD and its potential mechanism. We demonstrated that B. fragilis aggravated HFD-induced NAFLD by regulating lipid metabolism and remodeling gut microbiota.

RESULTS

Commensal B. fragilis triggered an increase in body weight and obesity in HFD-fed mice

After being given 1 week to adjust to their circumstances, the experimental mice were subjected to an HFD for 16 weeks in order to induce liver steatosis. To investigate the effects of B. fragilis on NAFLD, we assigned four groups of mice: the C group received a chow diet with phosphate buffer solution (PBS), the CB group received a chow diet with B. fragilis, the H group received an HFD with PBS, and the HB group received an HFD with B. fragilis for the last 8 weeks (Fig. 1A). Mice fed an HFD developed obesity-related symptoms, as evidenced by an increase in body weight in comparison to mice on a control diet. Moreover, B. fragilis further exacerbated HFD-induced obesity (Fig. 1B). The weight growth in the H group began to significantly exceed that of the C group starting from the 5th week (P < 0.05). The weight growth in the HB group was obviously higher compared with that observed in the H group, starting from the 12th week (P < 0.05). At 17 weeks, in comparison to the C group, the H group demonstrated significant increases in liver weight (1.346 vs 0.9047), liver index (4.129 vs 3.259), epididymal fat (0.8837 vs 0.4088), perirenal fat (0.4462 vs 0.2676), and kidney (0.4010 vs 0.3327) (P < 0.01; Fig. 1C through F; Fig. S1A). Meanwhile, supplementation of B. fragilis further exacerbated the weight of these tissues in HFD-fed mice (P < 0.05).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Commensal B. fragilis triggered an increase in body weight and obesity in HFD-fed mice. (A) Experimental protocol. (B) Body weight. (C) Liver weight. (D) Liver index. (E) Epididymal fat weight. (F) Perirenal fat weight. Values were shown as the mean ± SD (n = 8). Statistical analysis involved a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (B) and a one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (C−F). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.

Commensal B. fragilis aggravated glucolipid metabolism and liver dysfunction in HFD-fed mice

The liver, being the principal organ responsible for glucolipid metabolism, exhibits impaired functionality as a significant abnormality. The mice in the H group had a more severe lipid metabolic problem than the C group, as shown by significantly higher serum total cholesterol (TC) (3.520 vs 2.012), triglyceride (TG) (0.3089 vs 0.2376), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (1.985 vs 1.075) (P < 0.05; Fig. 2A through C). In comparison to the H group, the HB group showed elevated levels of serum TC (4.399 vs 3.520), TG (0.3749 vs 0.3089), and LDL-C (3.009 vs 1.985) levels in mice (P < 0.01). Although high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels in the H group were significantly lower than those in the C group, there was no statistically significant difference (Fig. S1B). Mice fed with an HFD exhibited exacerbated liver dysfunction, as evidenced by a significant increase in serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (47.90 vs 22.61) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (60.30 vs 30.85), compared with the C group (P < 0.05; Fig. 2D and E). Supplementation with B. fragilis significantly increased ALT levels (103.9 vs 60.30; P = 0.0014), while having little influence on AST levels (57.09 vs 47.90; P = 0.3469), compared with the H group. With regard to glucose metabolism, in comparison to the C group, HFD-fed mice had a higher fasting blood glucose (FBG) level (6.900 vs 4.933) and that level was drastically higher in the HB group than that in the H group (8.700 vs 6.900) (P < 0.05, Fig. 2F).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Commensal B. fragilis aggravated glucolipid metabolism and liver dysfunction in HFD-fed mice. (A) TC levels in the serum. (B) TG levels in the serum. (C) LDL-C levels in the serum. (D) AST levels in the serum. (E) ALT levels in the serum. (F) FBG levels. Values were shown as the mean ± SD (n = 6). Statistical analysis involved a one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.

The levels of TC, TG, LDL-C, ALT, and AST in the liver of mice given an HFD were significantly higher than those in the C group (P < 0.05; Fig. S2A through E). Surprisingly, compared with the H group, supplementation of B. fragilis dramatically raised the ALT level in the liver (41.58 vs 35.49; P = 0.0313; Fig. S2D). Although the levels of TG, TC, LDL, and AST in the liver of the HB group were higher than those of the H group, the differences were not statistically significant (Fig. S2A through C and E). Furthermore, the H group had higher levels of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the serum (17.89 vs 7.458) and liver (9.531 vs 4.473) than the C group (P < 0.001; Fig. S1C and S2F). B. fragilis significantly increased serum (22.31 vs 17.89) and liver (14.16 vs 9.531) LPS levels in comparison to the H group (P < 0.001; Fig. S1C and S2F). In general, the findings showed that B. fragilis exacerbated liver dysfunction, including the accumulation of lipids in the liver and disturbances in glucolipid metabolism.

Commensal B. fragilis aggravated lipid accumulation and lipid metabolism in the liver in HFD-fed mice

We subsequently conducted a histopathological examination of the liver. In hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining, B. fragilis showed a significant increase in the occurrence of lipid droplets and hepatocyte ballooning degeneration as compared with the H group (Fig. 3A). According to the NAFLD activity score (NAS) histological system, the HB group demonstrated a significantly higher NAS compared with the H group (P < 0.05; Fig. 3C). Oil red O (ORO) staining demonstrated a higher presence of red-stained lipids in the H group, which was enhanced further in the HB group, as well as an increase in oil red-positive regions (Fig. 3B and D). HFD increased total TG and TC concentrations in the liver, as well as lipogenesis-related gene expression, including stearoyl coenzyme decarboxylase 1 (SCD1), sterol regulatory element binding protein 1 (SREBP1), fatty acid synthase (FAS), acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 (ACC1), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ), and fatty acid translocase (CD36), which were exacerbated by B. fragilis treatment (P < 0.05; Fig. 3F through J). Compared with the C group, the H group had no significant difference in sterol regulatory element binding protein 1 (SREBP1) levels, whereas an increase was observed in the HB group (P < 0.05; Fig. 3E). HFD downregulated fatty acid β-oxidation genes including peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα), carnitine palmitoyl transferase-1 (CPT-1), and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor 1α (PGC-1α), and fatty acid decomposition genes including hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL) and adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) (P < 0.05; Fig. 3K through O). Compared with the H group, CPT-1, HSL, and ATGL were reduced by B. fragilis treatment (P < 0.05; Fig. 3L, N and O).

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Commensal B. fragilis aggravated lipid accumulation and lipid metabolism in the liver in HFD-fed mice. (A) Representative HE staining of liver samples via microscope (200× magnification). (B) Representative ORO staining of liver samples via microscope (200× magnification). (C) NAS score. (D) Positive area rates in ORO staining. (E) SREBP1 mRNA levels. (F) FAS mRNA levels. (G) SCD1 mRNA levels. (H) ACC1 mRNA levels. (I) PPARγ mRNA levels. (J) CD36 mRNA levels. (K) PPARα mRNA levels. (L) CPT-1 mRNA levels. (M) PGC-1α mRNA levels. (N) HSL mRNA levels. (O) ATGL mRNA levels. Values were shown as the mean ± SD (n  =  6 in A and C, n = 3 in B and D-O). Statistical analysis involved a one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test or LSD test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.

Commensal B. fragilis altered gut microbiota in HFD-fed mice

Gut microbiota might have a role in the development of NAFLD. We investigated the impacts of commensal B. fragilis on gut microbiota by applying high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. All rarefaction curves approached a plateau, suggesting that the sequencing depth was adequate for subsequent analysis (Fig. S3A). Alpha diversity including the ACE index (P = 0.045), Chao1 index (P = 0.037), Shannon index (P = 0.0091), and Simpson index (P = 0.011) in the H group were substantially less than that in the C group (Fig. 4A). These findings demonstrated that the richness and diversity of the gut microbiota were substantially different from the C group to the H group. With the B. fragilis supplement, the Shannon index was significantly decreased (P = 0.046), while the ACE index (P = 0.39), Chao1 index (P = 0.51), and Simpson index (P = 0.075) were decreased with no significant difference, compared with the H to the HB groups (Fig. 4A). Beta diversity was used to measure the variability of the intestinal microbiota structure, and samples were characterized using principal component analysis (PCA) and non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) to explore differences in the intestinal microbiota community composition. In the PCA and NMDS analyses, the samples showed distinct clustering patterns among the four groups (Fig. 4B and C). An HFD strongly influenced the community composition of the gut microbiota. Meanwhile, B. fragilis treatment showed an extensive effect on the diversity of bacteria.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Commensal B. fragilis altered gut microbiota in HFD-fed mice. (A) Alpha diversity such as the ACE, Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indexes for each group. (B) Beta diversity PCA. (C) NMDS score plot. (D) Heatmap of species clustering at the species level. Values were shown as the mean ± SD (n = 6). Statistical analysis involved the Kruskal-Wallis test and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) for beta diversity analyses. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.

In order to assess the compositional changes in the gut microbiota among the four groups, we carried out a systematic analysis at different levels of structures. At the phylum level, Bacteroidota, Firmicutes, and Desulfobacterota were identified as the top three most abundant microbial taxa (Fig S3B). The results showed that the relative abundances of Bacteroidota (62.68%) in the C group proved to be higher compared with those in the H group as well as the HB group (31.51% and 28.79%, respectively), while the C group exhibited a lower relative abundance of Firmicutes (32.46%) and Desulfobacterota (1.54%) compared with the H group (41.40% and 16.14%), respectively. Significantly, B. fragilis increased the relative abundance of Desulfobacterota (20.01%) (Fig S3B). These indicated that HFD and B. fragilis could change the gut microbiota community structure in mice. At the family level, Muribaculaceae, Lachnospiraceae, and Desulfovibrionaceae were the top three most abundant microorganisms. Compared with the H group (20.00% and 20.40%, respectively) and HB group (17.35% and 17.10%, respectively), the relative abundances of Muribaculaceae (51.89%) and Lachnospiraceae (24.40%) were higher in the C group. Similar to Desulfobacterota, Desulfovibrionaceae had a lower relative abundance in the C group (1.54%) in comparison with the H group (16.14%) and the HB group (20.01%) (Fig. S3C). At the species level, compared with the C group, the relative abundances of Bacteroides_acidifaciens (13.45%), Paraprevotella_clara (2.56%), Muribacter_muris (0.05%), Lactobacillus_gasseri (0.02%), Dialister_sp (0.05%), Alistipes_timonensis (0.03%), and Clostridium_perfringens (0.04%) were increased substantially in the CB group, while the relative abundances of Firmicutes_bacterium (3.58%), Alistipes_sp (0.28%), Rikenella_microfusus (0.20%), Lactobacillus_johnsonii (0.62%), Dorea_sp (0.27%), and Metamycoplasma_sualvi (0.02%) were significantly decreased in the CB group. The H group mice were noted at the species level, including higher Anaerofustis_stercorihominis (0.02%), Adlercreutzia_caecicola (0.02%), Alistipes_indistinctus (0.02%), Holdemania_massiliensis (0.67%), Mucispirillum_sp (1.11%), Alistipes_finegoldii (4.68%), and Clostridioides_difficile (2.01%) correlated to the C group. B. fragilis significantly increased the relative abundance of Desulfovibrio_fairfieldensis (0.28%), Adlercreutzia_mucosicola (0.04%), Agathobacter_ruminis (0.04%), Bacteroides_fragilis (4.81%), Bacteroides_vulgatus (1.68%), Butyricimonas_synergistica (0.64%), Enterococcus_faecalis (0.11%), Flavonifractor_plautii (0.13%), Helicobacter_sp (1.21%), Holdemania_filiformis (0.21%), Morganella_morganii (0.07%), Mucispirillum_schaedleri (0.56%), and Parabacteroides_sp (0.27%) in HFD mice (Fig. 4D).

To identify the distinct bacterial groups within various categories, we used the linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) technique (Fig S3D). Surprisingly, the findings revealed a distinct difference in gut microbiota in the four groups. The H group showed a higher abundance of Firmicutes within the phylum level, Clostridia within the class level, and Oscillospirales within the order level compared with the C group, whereas the CB group showed an increased prevalence of Bacteroidales within the order level. Similarly, B. fragilis changed gut microbiota, especially enriched in Desulfovibrionales in HFD mice (Fig. S3D). All of these results indicated that commensal B. fragilis changed gut microbiota.

Effect of commensal B. fragilis on SCFAs of microbial metabolites

To examine the variations in SCFA levels associated with gut microbiota in mice, we used gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to analyze the levels of seven SCFAs found in mouse fecal samples: acetic acid (AA), propionic acid (PA), butyric acid (BA), isobutyric acid (IBA), valeric acid (VA), isovaleric acid (IVA), and caproic acid (CA). We observed comparable overall levels of SCFAs in the stool samples from all four groups, predominantly comprising AA, PA, and BA. AA was the most multiple of the three SCFAs, next to PA and BA. Following that, the SCFAs present in the stool samples were subjected to analysis. IBA and IVA levels were considerably higher in the H group compared with the C group, but AA and CA levels were significantly lower. The commensal B. fragilis increased BA and VA levels compared with the C group. Although the levels of AA, PA, BA, IBA, IVA, and CA were increased with commensal B. fragilis treatment compared with the H group, significant differences were not found (Fig. 5A through G). These results suggested that an HFD has a significant regulatory effect on SCFAs, which were metabolites of gut microbiota. B. fragilis had a regulatory effect on some SCFAs under a normal diet but had little effect on SCFAs under an HFD.

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Effect of commensal B. fragilis on SCFAs of microbial metabolites. (A–G) SCFA levels. (H) Pearson correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between the levels of metabolites and the prevalence of specific bacterial species. Values were shown as the mean ± SD (n = 5). Statistical analysis involved one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.

Correlation analysis of intestinal microbiota with SCFAs, serum biochemistry, and liver lipid metabolism

To investigate the potential association between alterations in gut microbiota and SCFAs, Pearson correlation analysis was performed to assess the correlation between different bacteria and SCFAs (Fig. 5H). Microbial abundance and SCFA content of correlation analysis showed that Bifidobacteriaceae and Muribaculaceae had significantly negative correlations with AA. Bifidobacteriaceae and Muribaculaceae had clear positive correlations with PA, while Helicobacteraceae, Erysipelotrichaceae, Oscillospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae, and Desulfovibrionaceae had clear negative correlations with PA. Interestingly, there was no obvious correlation between BA and gut microbiota in this study. Lactobacillaceae had clear positive correlations with CA.

The correlation between serum metabolism and gut microbiota was further analyzed (Fig. S4A). The Pearson correlation analysis showed that Desulfovibrionaceae had clear positive correlations with TC, LDL-C, AST, and LPS levels in the serum. Erysipelotrichaceae had clear positive correlations with LDL-C levels in the serum. In addition, Prevotellaceae had an extremely negative correlation with serum levels of TG, TC, LDL-C, AST, and LPS. Muribaculaceae had an extremely negative correlation with serum levels of TC, LDL-C, and LPS. Bifidobacteriaceae had an extremely negative correlation with serum levels of LDL-C, AST, and LPS.

We then examined the correlation between gut microbiota and liver metabolism (Fig. S4B). The Pearson correlation analysis showed that Bacteroidaceae had clear positive correlations with TC, LDL-C, AST, and LPS levels in the liver. Desulfovibrionaceae had clear positive correlations with the liver level of TG. Prevotellaceae had clear negative correlations with TG TC, ALT, AST, and LPS levels in the liver. Muribaculaceae had clear negative correlations with the levels of TC in the liver. Among the genes involved in liver lipid metabolism, Pearson’s correlation analysis showed that ATGL had clear positive correlations with Bifidobacteriaceae, Prevotellaceae, and Muribaculaceae, while having clear negative correlations with Erysipelotrichaceae and Desulfovibrionaceae. HSL had clear negative correlations with Erysipelotrichaceae. ACC1 had clear positive correlations with Desulfovibrionaceae. CD36 had a clear positive correlations with Desulfovibrionaceae, while had a clear negative correlation with Prevotellaceae.

DISCUSSION

An increasing amount of evidence demonstrate that intestinal dysfunction has a profound impact on a variety of phenotypic alterations and the development of disorders relevant to an HFD, including NAFLD (4, 5, 22). The commensal microbiome has been demonstrated to be a significant contributor to gastrointestinal and liver disorders (23). A viable mouse model was established in this study by introducing a single microbe into a diverse microbial community to research the impact of commensal B. fragilis on the metabolism and interactions between microbes under an HFD condition. The findings indicated that the disorder of lipid metabolism induced by an HFD was worsened by the presence of commensal B. fragilis. This ultimately exacerbated the development and progression of NAFLD in a murine model.

After a 16-week duration on an HFD, the mice in the H group showed a substantial rise in body weight compared with those in the C group. This finding complied with previous studies that reported significant weight gains in male C57BL/6J mice after being fed an HFD for a duration of 12 weeks (24, 25). The presence of B. fragilis symbiont in conjunction with a diet rich in fats resulted in significant weight gain and enhanced lipid synthesis in adipose and hepatic tissues. Additionally, adipose tissue accumulation was observed in HB mice along with a rise in serum levels of TC and TG, as showed in a previous study (18). It is interesting that B. fragilis alone in chow diet increased body weight, lipid accumulation in the liver, and lipogenesis-related gene expression in our study. Consistent with a previous animal study, B. fragilis colonization could increase the weight of the liver, muscle, and epididymal fat pad (EPF) in B. fragilis gnotobiotic mice (26). A clinical study found that an increased abundance of B. fragilis was associated with obesity in peri- and post-menopausal women (20). Another clinical study showed a higher B. fragilis in infants born vaginally to overweight mothers (27). All of these studies suggested that B. fragilis may be an important therapeutic target for obesity intervention. In the future, more research will be desired to determine the precise mechanism. Lipogenesis, fatty acid absorption, and fatty acid oxidation constitute just some of the physiological processes that constitute the complex and variable liver lipid metabolism (28). HFD aggravated the expression level of hepatic lipid metabolism genes, and we first found B. fragilis further aggravated hepatic lipid metabolism. In our study, HFD mice initiated with B. fragilis showed higher serum and liver levels of ALT. According to a new study, B. fragilis had a significant association with TBA, ALT, and AST in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (29).

In our study, supplementation of B. fragilis increased FBG levels and exacerbated glucose metabolism in HFD-fed mice. Supplementation of B. fragilis in mice with increased intestinal permeability led to an expedited progression of the disease and a swift onset of hyperglycemia (19). NAFLD and NASH are associated with increased permeability of the intestinal barrier and translocation of bacteria or bacterial products into the circulation (30, 31). HFD-induced dysbiosis may result in bacteria being able to cross the impaired gut vascular barrier. Bacterial translocation during HFD may induce persistent inflammation, which, coupled with high lipid content in the diet, may drive metabolic disorders (30, 32).

B. fragilis is a crucial element of the commensal microbiota found in the human colon (19). In our study, no significant difference was observed in diversity index (Simpson) and richness index (Chao and ACE) between the H and HB groups. Similar to previous studies, the effect of B. fragilis on the diversity and richness of the microbiota may vary depending on whether the sample is mucosal or fecal and may also be related to the number of samples (33, 34). The beta diversity analysis revealed a significant change in the PCA index, indicating that although B. fragilis did not change the type of bacterial taxa present, it changed the relative abundance of bacteria at different taxonomic levels. As a result, the structure of the gut flora changes. Intestinal biological interactions between total are dynamic and complex. Compared with the C group, the H group exhibited a reduction in alpha diversity and an increase in Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio, consistent with previous research (3537). Desulfobacterota and Desulfovibrionaceae significantly increased in HFD mice, which is consistent with previous research (38, 39). B. fragilis further increased their levels with HFD. Desulfovibrionaceae are considered to be potentially harmful bacteria in the gut (40). HFD-induced lipopolysaccharide-associated bacteria in mice included Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Desulfovibrionaceae (41). In our study, levels of LPS in the serum and liver in the H and HB groups increased, which may be attributed to an increase in harmful bacteria associated with LPS in the gut.

SCFAs are the essential metabolites obtained from microbial digestion of carbohydrates and play an essential part in metabolism, neurological system, and immune function homeostasis (42). Similar to previous studies, an HFD significantly reduced the levels of AA, PA, and BA although there was no significant difference (43, 44). Interestingly, supplementation with commensal B. fragilis resulted in changes in the gut microbiota, but there was no significant effect of commensal B. fragilis on fecal SCFAs. Different from previous studies, Pearson correlation analysis showed that bacteria that produce SCFAs, such as Lachnospiraceae and Rikenellaceae, had no significant correlation with SCFA production (45). One probable reason is that bacteria create SCFAs that have an associated positive effect with some SCFA levels and an adverse relationship with others, causing increases in SCFA levels to be reversed. Meanwhile, these findings propose alternative mechanisms that may contribute to the compromised glucose metabolism and heightened lipid metabolism observed in HB mice.

Previous studies associated Desulfovibrionaceae with diabetes, overweight, NAFLD, and other metabolic diseases (4648). There was an obviously positive correlation between Desulfovibrionaceae and the levels of TC, LDL-C, and AST in both serum and liver, indicating that a possible reason for B. fragilis to aggravate fatty liver is caused by the change of intestinal flora and the increase of harmful bacteria Desulfovibrionaceae. In addition, Erysipelotrichaceae is also associated with fatty liver (49, 50). Erysipelotrichaceae exhibited a significant positive association with bloodstream TC and liver TG levels, as well as a substantial positive correlation with CD36 and ACC1, but a substantial negative correlation with ATGL. Under an HFD, the increase of harmful bacteria aggravated the abnormal lipid metabolism in the liver.

In summary, B. fragilis exacerbates HFD-induced overweight, glucose dysregulation, and lipid metabolic dysregulation under long-term HFD feeding conditions. With an HFD, commensal B. fragilis changes the gut microbiota and increased translocation of bacterial-derived substances such as LPS may result in altered glucose homeostasis and lipid metabolism. B. fragilis strain is a member of the intestinal tract, under the background of HFD intervention effects on the metabolism of the host. This study demonstrates the essence in studying the importance of specific gut symbionts in the development of obesity and NAFLD, in order to develop strategies for controlling these symbionts and improving metabolic outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Culture of B. fragilis

B. fragilis (ATCC 25285) was derived from the China Center for Type Culture Collection. B. fragilis was cultured on Columbia blood agar at 37°C with anaerobic conditions for 2448 hours. Subsequently, B. fragilis was cultivated in a brain heart infusion medium at 37°C with anaerobic circumstances for 24–48 hours. All mediums were purchased from Qingdao Hope Bio-Technology Company (Qingdao, China). B. fragilis was harvested and resuspended in PBS for measurement of optical density (OD) at 600 nm, as described previously (15).

Animals

Six-week-old C57BL/6J inbred specific pathogen-free (SPF) male mice were acquired from Hunan Slake Jingda Experimental Animal Co. Ltd. (Changsha, China). Mice were housed in a regulated environment, providing unrestricted availability of food and water, under a 12-hour daylight cycle at 25°C ± 2°C. Mice were assigned at random into four groups after a week of adaptation (C, CB, H, and HB group, n = 8). The mice in the C and CB groups were provided with a standard chow diet (Jiangsu Xietong), while the mice in the H and HB groups were provided with an HFD (Jiangsu Xietong) for a duration of 16 weeks. Mice in CB and HB groups were administered intragastrically with B. fragilis at an oral dosage of 2 × 108 CFU per 200 µL every alternate day for the last 8 weeks (51). Mice in the C and H groups were administered with the equivalent amount of PBS. All animals have been cared for in compliance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Huazhong University of Science and Technology (IACUC Number: 3326).

Specimen collection

The total weight of the mice was measured weekly during the course of the experiment. In the last week before euthanasia, the FBG levels were assessed following an 8-hour period of fasting. The mice were subjected to tail vein blood collection. An adaptable blood glucose meter and blood glucose test sheets were utilized to measure blood glucose levels. The excrement of mice was freshly gathered and preserved in a refrigerator at −80°C. The mice were starved overnight, weighed, and euthanized under anesthesia in accordance with guidelines for experimental animals. Blood was taken and allowed to coagulate for 30 minutes in microcentrifuge tubes. The upper serum was centrifuged next, and then, it was kept for further examination at −80°C. Weigh liver, kidneys, epididymal fat, and perirenal fat weight after euthanasia. The tissue samples were washed with pre-cooled saline solution to eliminate any residual blood or impurities adhering to the surface of the tissue and preserved in a refrigerator at −80°C.

Biochemical assays in serum and liver

The tissue blocks were weighed, cut into pieces, and homogenized by ultrasound in a proportion of 1:9 (tissue weight to PBS volume). The homogenate was transferred to a centrifuge tube and centrifuged for 10 minutes at 4°C at 1,000 g. To prevent recurrent cycles of freezing and thawing, the supernatant was gathered and stored at −80°C. Assay reagents (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, China) were used to detect serum and liver levels of TG, TC, AST, ALT, LDL-C, and HDL-C in accordance with the manufacturer’s directions (52).

RT-qPCR analysis

The RNA-Easy Isolation Reagent was used for extracting total RNA (Vazyme, China). The cDNA was then reverse transcribed using HiScript II QRT SuperMix for qPCR (Vazyme, China), according to the manufacturer’s directions (53). The mRNA levels of SREBP1, FAS, SCD1, ACC1, PPARγ, ACC1, CD36, PPARα, CPT-1, PGC1α, HSL, and ATGL were measured. The primers were presented in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Primer sequences

Gene Forward primer (5′−3′) Reverse primer (5′−3′)
SREBP1 GTGGAGACGCTTACCCCTC CCAAAGGATTGCAGGTCAGAC
FAS AGTTTAAAGCTGAGGAGGCGGGTT CAGGTTGGCATGGTTGACAGCAAA
SCD1 CCGGAGACCCCTTAGATCGA TAGCCTGTAAAAGATTTCTGCAAAC
ACC1 AATGAGACTAGCAAAACAATC ACGACCAAACAAAGAAATA
PPAR-γ TGGAGCCTAAGTTTGAGTT AGCAGGTTGTCTTGGATGT
CD36 AGAACTCTTGTGGGGTTAC GGACTCAATTATGGCAACT
PPAR-α AGCAACAACCCGCCTTTT GCACTGGCAGCAGTGGAA
CPT-1 GTGTCCAAGTATCTGGCAGTC ATAGCCGTCATCAGCAACC
PGC-1α TCATCACCTACCGTTACAC ACAGCTCGAAGTCAGTTTC
HSL TTCGGGGAGCACTACAAAC CCACGCAACTCTGGGTCTA
ATGL GACCTGATGACCACCCTTTC TGCTACCCGTCTGCTCTTT
GAPDH TCAACGGCACAGTCAAGG TTAGTGGGGTCTCGCTCC

HE staining

The hepatic tissues were fixed in a neutral fixative containing 4% paraformaldehyde for a minimum of 24 hours. After undergoing dehydration and transparency processes, the tissue was embedded in wax to form a block. Thin sections measuring 4 μm were then dewaxed, hydrated, stained, dehydrated again, and covered with a coverslip. An optical microscope (Olympus) was utilized for the observation and photography of the sections. The liver histological score was determined by using the NASs. The scoring system contains steatosis (0–3), lobular inflammation (0–2), hepatocellular ballooning (0–2), and fibrosis (0–4). Liver fibrosis was not assessed during the limited duration of the modeling period, as described previously (54).

Liver staining with ORO

To identify liver lipid droplet accumulation, an ORO kit (Servicebio, Wuhan, China) was used. With a frozen slicer, liver tissue sections were made at a thickness of 10 µm and dyed according to the directions of the ORO staining kit. Lipid droplets emerged as red-stained structures, while nuclei were dark-blue stained. ImageJ software was used to quantify the lipid droplets.

The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

LPS concentrations among liver tissues and serum were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent test (Bioswamp, China), as directed by the manufacturer.

16S rRNA gene sequencing

The genomic DNA of bacteria was isolated from frozen stool samples by using the CTAB/SDS technique, following the manufacturer’s guidelines (55). The Qubit assay was employed for quantifying DNA concentration, while using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, the integrity of isolated genomic DNA was assessed. Primer set 341F-806R was used to amplify the 16S rRNA V3/V4 region. 341F (5′-CCTAYGGGRBGCASCAG-3′) was the forward primer and 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′) was the reverse primer. The amplified PCR products were mixed to build the library, and the sequencing adapter was added. After PCR amplification, the small fragments such as primer dimer were removed by magnetic bead sorting, and the library index information was recorded. Samples exhibiting a unique amplification outcome were chosen for subsequent investigation. After preparing DNA libraries, sequencing was conducted using an Illumina NovaSeq platform, following the standard protocols provided by Baiaoweifan Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Wuhan, China). Amplicon sequencing data, primer removal, quality control, ASV inference, double-end splicing, and ASV feature table generation for further analysis are the data analysis process. For quality control of the original sequencing sequence, use the FLASH software. Select a window size of 50 bps, and filter readings with a tail mass value less than 20. Based on the overlap connection between PE reads, the paired reads are combined into a sequence with a minimum overlap length of 10 bp. There is no match between the screening and the sequence, and the maximum permitted mismatch ratio in the concatenated sequence’s overlap area is 0.2. Utilizing the barcode and the primers at the start and finish of the sequence, distinguish the sample; if required, change the direction of the sequence. A maximum of two primer mismatches are allowed, while zero mismatches are allowed for the barcode. Using default parameters, the DADA2 method in the Qiime2 process is employed to denoise and optimize the sequence after quality control stitching. The sequences obtained after DADA2 denoising are commonly referred to as ASVs. The number of denoised sequences for each sample was normalized to 4,000 in order to reduce the effect of sequencing depth on the outcomes of following analyses, such as alpha diversity and beta diversity. Even after flattening each sample, the average coverage of Good’s may still be 97.90%. Based on the Sliva 16S rRNA database, a Naive Bayes classifier from Qiime2 was used to conduct the taxonomic analysis of ASVs.

Determination of fecal SCFAs

GC-MS was used to measure the amounts of SCFAs in stool samples. As in the prior investigation, samples were pretreated (56). The supernatant was immediately subjected to GC-MS analysis after being passed through a 0.22-µm syringe filter. The conditions for GC analysis were as follows: the capillary column size was 30 mm × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm. The carrier gas, helium, had a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. The temperature of the front injection was 200°C. The oven temperature ramp was as follows: 90°C for 1 min, then 100°C at a rate of 25°C/min, then 150°C at a rate of 20°C/min, held for 0.6 min, and 200°C at a rate of 25°C/min, maintained for 0.5 min, after operating for 3 min. The transfer line temperature was 230°C, the ion source temperature was 230°C, and the quad temperature was 150°C. An electron bombardment ionization (EI) source with full scan and sim scanning modes at an electron energy of 70 eV was used in the mass spectrometry analysis. An Agilent chemical workstation was used to process all of the data. Based on the standard, the MWDB (Metware Database) was created to qualitatively interpret mass spectrometry data.

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism 8.0 and SPSS 22.0 statistical software were used for data analysis, with assessment of normality (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) and variance homogeneity (Fisher’s F-test). One-way or two-way ANOVA was employed to compare data across multiple groups, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test or LSD test. Mean ± SD values were reported. Statistical tests included Kruskal-Wallis Pairwise test for alpha diversity analysis, PERMANOVA for beta diversity analyses, and non-parametric Pearson test to examine the correlation between gut microbiota and host metabolism.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant YCJJ202201051, the Internal Medicine Research Fund of Liyuan Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (2023LYYYCXTD0002), and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC2002000).

Y.M.H. and Z.F.X. designed the study. Y.M.H. wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. Y.M.H. and M.P.Z. performed the experiments. Y.M.H., J.L.C., and Z.W.W. contributed data. Z.J. reviewed the initial draft of the manuscript. J.L.C., Z.J., and Z.F.X. reviewed and edited the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Footnotes

writing - original draft

Contributor Information

Zhifan Xiong, Email: xiongzhifan@126.com.

Cheng-Yuan Kao, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The raw sequencing data were submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database and given the accession number PRJNA1013139.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.03393-23.

Supplemental figures. spectrum.03393-23-s0001.docx.

Fig. S1 to S4.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03393-23.SuF1

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Fava F, Rizzetto L, Tuohy KM. 2019. Gut microbiota and health: connecting actors across the metabolic system. Proc Nutr Soc 78:177–188. doi: 10.1017/S0029665118002719 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Shi N, Li N, Duan X, Niu H. 2017. Interaction between the gut microbiome and mucosal immune system. Mil Med Res 4:14. doi: 10.1186/s40779-017-0122-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ge Y, Wang X, Guo Y, Yan J, Abuduwaili A, Aximujiang K, Yan J, Wu M. 2021. Gut microbiota influence tumor development and alter interactions with the human immune system. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 40:42. doi: 10.1186/s13046-021-01845-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lang S, Schnabl B. 2020. Microbiota and fatty liver disease-the known, the unknown, and the future. Cell Host Microbe 28:233–244. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.07.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Aron-Wisnewsky J, Vigliotti C, Witjes J, Le P, Holleboom AG, Verheij J, Nieuwdorp M, Clément K. 2020. Gut microbiota and human NAFLD: disentangling microbial signatures from metabolic disorders. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 17:279–297. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-0269-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zhuge A, Li S, Lou P, Wu W, Wang K, Yuan Y, Xia J, Li B, Li L. 2022. Longitudinal 16S rRNA sequencing reveals relationships among alterations of gut microbiota and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease progression in mice. Microbiol Spectr 10:e0004722. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00047-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Vallianou N, Stratigou T, Christodoulatos GS, Dalamaga M. 2019. Understanding the role of the gut microbiome and microbial metabolites in obesity and obesity-associated metabolic disorders: current evidence and perspectives. Curr Obes Rep 8:317–332. doi: 10.1007/s13679-019-00352-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Soderborg TK, Clark SE, Mulligan CE, Janssen RC, Babcock L, Ir D, Young B, Krebs N, Lemas DJ, Johnson LK, Weir T, Lenz LL, Frank DN, Hernandez TL, Kuhn KA, D’Alessandro A, Barbour LA, El Kasmi KC, Friedman JE. 2018. The gut microbiota in infants of obese mothers increases inflammation and susceptibility to NAFLD. Nat Commun 9:4462. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06929-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Zhang R, Xu Z, Xue G, Feng J, Du B, Gan L, Fan Z, Fu T, Feng Y, Zhao H, Cui J, Yan C, Cui X, Tian Z, Chen J, Yu Z, Yuan J. 2023. Combined methylation and transcriptome analysis of liver injury of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease induced by high alcohol-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Microbiol Spectr 11:e0532322. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.05323-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Sun F, Zhang Q, Zhao J, Zhang H, Zhai Q, Chen W. 2019. A potential species of next-generation probiotics? the dark and light sides of Bacteroides fragilis in health. Food Res Int 126:108590. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108590 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Sears CL, Geis AL, Housseau F. 2014. Bacteroides fragilis subverts mucosal biology: from symbiont to colon carcinogenesis. J Clin Invest 124:4166–4172. doi: 10.1172/JCI72334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Casterline BW, Hecht AL, Choi VM, Bubeck Wardenburg J. 2017. The Bacteroides fragilis pathogenicity island links virulence and strain competition. Gut Microbes 8:374–383. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2017.1290758 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Franco AA, Cheng RK, Goodman A, Sears CL. 2002. Modulation of bft expression by the Bacteroides fragilis pathogenicity island and its flanking region. Mol Microbiol 45:1067–1077. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03077.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Chan JL, Wu S, Geis AL, Chan GV, Gomes TAM, Beck SE, Wu X, Fan H, Tam AJ, Chung L, Ding H, Wang H, Pardoll DM, Housseau F, Sears CL. 2019. Non-toxigenic Bacteroides fragilis (NTBF) administration reduces bacteria-driven chronic colitis and tumor development independent of polysaccharide A. Mucosal Immunol 12:164–177. doi: 10.1038/s41385-018-0085-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Li D, Pan Y, Xia X, Liang J, Liu F, Dou H, Hou Y. 2020. Bacteroides fragilis alleviates the symptoms of lupus nephritis via regulating CD1d and CD86 expressions in B cells. Eur J Pharmacol 884:173421. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173421 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Ramakrishna C, Kujawski M, Chu H, Li L, Mazmanian SK, Cantin EM. 2019. Bacteroides fragilis polysaccharide A induces IL-10 secreting B and T cells that prevent viral encephalitis. Nat Commun 10:2153. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09884-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Debédat J, Le Roy T, Voland L, Belda E, Alili R, Adriouch S, Bel Lassen P, Kasahara K, Hutchison E, Genser L, Torres L, Gamblin C, Rouault C, Zucker J-D, Kapel N, Poitou C, Marcelin G, Rey FE, Aron-Wisnewsky J, Clément K. 2022. The human gut microbiota contributes to type-2 diabetes non-resolution 5-years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Gut Microbes 14:2050635. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2050635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Shi G, Lin Y, Wu Y, Zhou J, Cao L, Chen J, Li Y, Tan N, Zhong S. 2022. Bacteroides fragilis supplementation deteriorated metabolic dysfunction, inflammation, and aorta atherosclerosis by inducing gut microbiota dysbiosis in animal model. Nutrients 14:2199. doi: 10.3390/nu14112199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Sofi MH, Johnson BM, Gudi RR, Jolly A, Gaudreau M-C, Vasu C. 2019. Polysaccharide A-dependent opposing effects of mucosal and systemic exposures to human gut commensal Bacteroides fragilis in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 68:1975–1989. doi: 10.2337/db19-0211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Shen W-D, Lin X, Liu H-M, Li B-Y, Qiu X, Lv W-Q, Zhu X-Z, Greenbaum J, Liu R-K, Shen J, Xiao H-M, Deng H-W. 2022. Gut microbiota accelerates obesity in peri-/post-menopausal women via Bacteroides fragilis and acetic acid. Int J Obes (Lond) 46:1918–1924. doi: 10.1038/s41366-022-01137-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Sjögren YM, Tomicic S, Lundberg A, Böttcher MF, Björkstén B, Sverremark-Ekström E, Jenmalm MC. 2009. Influence of early gut microbiota on the maturation of childhood mucosal and systemic immune responses. Clin Exp Allergy 39:1842–1851. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03326.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Rodriguez-Diaz C, Taminiau B, García-García A, Cueto A, Robles-Díaz M, Ortega-Alonso A, Martín-Reyes F, Daube G, Sanabria-Cabrera J, Jimenez-Perez M, Isabel Lucena M, Andrade RJ, García-Fuentes E, García-Cortes M. 2022. Microbiota diversity in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and in drug-induced liver injury. Pharmacol Res 182:106348. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Adolph TE, Grander C, Moschen AR, Tilg H. 2018. Liver-microbiome axis in health and disease. Trends Immunol 39:712–723. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2018.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Ding Q, Guo R, Pei L, Lai S, Li J, Yin Y, Xu T, Yang W, Song Q, Han Q, Dou X, Li S. 2022. N-acetylcysteine alleviates high fat diet-induced hepatic steatosis and liver injury via regulating the intestinal microecology in mice. Food Funct 13:3368–3380. doi: 10.1039/d1fo03952k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Sun L, Xie C, Wang G, Wu Y, Wu Q, Wang X, Liu J, Deng Y, Xia J, Chen B, et al. 2018. Gut microbiota and intestinal FXR mediate the clinical benefits of metformin. Nat Med 24:1919–1929. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0222-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Hsu YJ, Chiu CC, Li YP, Huang WC, Huang YT, Huang CC, Chuang HL. 2015. Effect of intestinal microbiota on exercise performance in mice. J Strength Cond Res 29:552–558. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000644 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Singh SB, Madan J, Coker M, Hoen A, Baker ER, Karagas MR, Mueller NT. 2020. Does birth mode modify associations of maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain with the infant gut microbiome? Int J Obes (Lond) 44:23–32. doi: 10.1038/s41366-018-0273-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Sun H-J, Tan J-X, Shan X-D, Wang Z-C, Wu Z-Y, Bian J-S, Nie X-W. 2023. DR region of NKAα1 is a target to ameliorate hepatic lipid metabolism disturbance in obese mice. Metabolism 145:155579. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2023.155579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Tang B, Tang L, Li S, Liu S, He J, Li P, Wang S, Yang M, Zhang L, Lei Y, Tu D, Tang X, Hu H, Ouyang Q, Chen X, Yang S. 2023. Gut microbiota alters host bile acid metabolism to contribute to intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Nat Commun 14:1305. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36981-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Mouries J, Brescia P, Silvestri A, Spadoni I, Sorribas M, Wiest R, Mileti E, Galbiati M, Invernizzi P, Adorini L, Penna G, Rescigno M. 2019. Microbiota-driven gut vascular barrier disruption is a prerequisite for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis development. J Hepatol 71:1216–1228. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.08.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Cheng C, Tan J, Qian W, Zhang L, Hou X. 2018. Gut inflammation exacerbates hepatic injury in the high-fat diet induced NAFLD mouse: attention to the gut-vascular barrier dysfunction. Life Sci 209:157–166. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2018.08.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Fiaschini N, Negroni A, Palone F, Vitali R, Colantoni E, Laudadio I, Mancuso M, Cucchiara S, Stronati L. 2022. Colonic inflammation accelerates the progression of liver disease: a protective role of dipotassium glycyrrhizate. Dig Liver Dis 54:1084–1093. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.11.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Zhang H, Hua R, Zhang B, Zhang X, Yang H, Zhou X. 2018. Serine alleviates dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis and regulates the gut microbiota in mice. Front Microbiol 9:3062. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Yuan L, Zhang R, Li X, Gao C, Hu X, Hussain S, Zhang L, Wang M, Ma X, Pan Q, Lou X, Si S. 2023. Long-term simulated microgravity alters gut microbiota and metabolome in mice. Front Microbiol 14:1100747. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1100747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Porras D, Nistal E, Martínez-Flórez S, Pisonero-Vaquero S, Olcoz JL, Jover R, González-Gallego J, García-Mediavilla MV, Sánchez-Campos S. 2017. Protective effect of quercetin on high-fat diet-induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in mice is mediated by modulating intestinal microbiota imbalance and related gut-liver axis activation. Free Radic Biol Med 102:188–202. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.11.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Zhang X-L, Chen L, Yang J, Zhao S-S, Jin S, Ao N, Yang J, Liu H-X, Du J. 2023. Vitamin D alleviates non-alcoholic fatty liver disease via restoring gut microbiota and metabolism. Front Microbiol 14:1117644. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1117644 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Matsui M, Fukunishi S, Nakano T, Ueno T, Higuchi K, Asai A. 2021. Ileal bile acid transporter inhibitor improves hepatic steatosis by ameliorating gut microbiota dysbiosis in NAFLD model mice. mBio 12:e0115521. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01155-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Kong B, Fu H, Xiao Z, Zhou Y, Shuai W, Huang H. 2022. Gut microbiota dysbiosis induced by a high-fat diet increases susceptibility to atrial fibrillation. Can J Cardiol 38:1962–1975. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2022.08.231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Wu J-X, He Q, Zhou Y, Xu J-Y, Zhang Z, Chen C-L, Wu Y-H, Chen Y, Qin L-Q, Li Y-H. 2023. Protective effect and mechanism of lactoferrin combined with hypoxia against high-fat diet induced obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in mice. Int J Biol Macromol 227:839–850. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.12.211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Zhang B, Fan X, Du H, Zhao M, Zhang Z, Zhu R, He B, Zhang Y, Li X, Li J, Gu N. 2023. Foodborne carbon dot exposure induces insulin resistance through gut microbiota dysbiosis and damaged intestinal mucus layer. ACS Nano 17:6081–6094. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c01005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Wang X, Yu C, Liu X, Yang J, Feng Y, Wu Y, Xu Y, Zhu Y, Li W. 2022. Fenofibrate ameliorated systemic and retinal inflammation and modulated gut microbiota in high-fat diet-induced mice. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12:839592. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.839592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Ikeda T, Nishida A, Yamano M, Kimura I. 2022. Short-chain fatty acid receptors and gut microbiota as therapeutic targets in metabolic, immune, and neurological diseases. Pharmacol Ther 239:108273. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Whitt J, Woo V, Lee P, Moncivaiz J, Haberman Y, Denson L, Tso P, Alenghat T. 2018. Disruption of epithelial HDAC3 in intestine prevents diet-induced obesity in mice. Gastroenterology 155:501–513. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.04.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Zhang X-Y, Chen J, Yi K, Peng L, Xie J, Gou X, Peng T, Tang L. 2020. Phlorizin ameliorates obesity-associated endotoxemia and insulin resistance in high-fat diet-fed mice by targeting the gut microbiota and intestinal barrier integrity. Gut Microbes 12:1–18. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1842990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Chen H, Sun Y, Zhao H, Qi X, Cui H, Li Q, Ma Y. 2022. α-lactalbumin peptide Asp-Gln-Trp alleviates hepatic insulin resistance and modulates gut microbiota dysbiosis in high-fat diet-induced NAFLD mice. Food Funct 13:9878–9892. doi: 10.1039/d2fo01343f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Wu J, Liu Y, Dou Z, Wu T, Liu R, Sui W, Jin Y, Zhang M. 2020. Black garlic melanoidins prevent obesity, reduce serum LPS levels and modulate the gut microbiota composition in high-fat diet-induced obese C57BL/6J mice. Food Funct 11:9585–9598. doi: 10.1039/d0fo02379e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Ma P, Mo R, Liao H, Qiu C, Wu G, Yang C, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Song X-J. 2022. Gut microbiota depletion by antibiotics ameliorates somatic neuropathic pain induced by nerve injury, chemotherapy, and diabetes in mice. J Neuroinflammation 19:169. doi: 10.1186/s12974-022-02523-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Zhang X, Coker OO, Chu ES, Fu K, Lau HCH, Wang Y-X, Chan AWH, Wei H, Yang X, Sung JJY, Yu J. 2021. Dietary cholesterol drives fatty liver-associated liver cancer by modulating gut microbiota and metabolites. Gut 70:761–774. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Zhang Y, Gu Y, Jiang J, Cui X, Cheng S, Liu L, Huang Z, Liao R, Zhao P, Yu J, Wang J, Jia Y, Jin W, Zhou F. 2022. Stigmasterol attenuates hepatic steatosis in rats by strengthening the intestinal barrier and improving bile acid metabolism. NPJ Sci Food 6:38. doi: 10.1038/s41538-022-00156-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Chen G, Xie M, Dai Z, Wan P, Ye H, Zeng X, Sun Y. 2018. Kudingcha and Fuzhuan brick tea prevent obesity and modulate gut microbiota in high-fat diet fed mice. Mol Nutr Food Res 62:e1700485. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201700485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Shao X, Sun S, Zhou Y, Wang H, Yu Y, Hu T, Yao Y, Zhou C. 2021. Bacteroides fragilis restricts colitis-associated cancer via negative regulation of the NLRP3 axis. Cancer Lett 523:170–181. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Zhang L, Li H-X, Pan W-S, Ullah Khan F, Qian C, Qi-Li F-R, Xu X. 2019. Administration of methyl palmitate prevents non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) by induction of PPAR-α. Biomed Pharmacother 111:99–108. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.12.059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Wang Z, Huang Y, Zhu M, Cao J, Xiong Z. 2023. TLR2 and CASP7 as the biomarkers associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and chronic kidney disease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 667:50–57. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2023.05.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Gwag T, Reddy Mooli RG, Li D, Lee S, Lee EY, Wang S. 2021. Macrophage-derived thrombospondin 1 promotes obesity-associated non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. JHEP Rep 3:100193. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2020.100193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Xu Y, Wang Y, Li H, Dai Y, Chen D, Wang M, Jiang X, Huang Z, Yu H, Huang J, Xiong Z. 2021. Altered fecal microbiota composition in older adults with frailty. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:696186. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.696186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Bianchi F, Dall’Asta M, Del Rio D, Mangia A, Musci M, Scazzina F. 2011. Development of a headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometric method for the determination of short-chain fatty acids from intestinal fermentation. Food Chem 129:200–205. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.04.022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental figures. spectrum.03393-23-s0001.docx.

Fig. S1 to S4.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03393-23.SuF1

Data Availability Statement

The raw sequencing data were submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database and given the accession number PRJNA1013139.


Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES