Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Apr 2.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 19;27(10):3961–3969. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01735-z

Table 1.

Association of CAD (status and time of the diagnosis) with PCL total scores in MVP and UKB.

CAD MVP (PCL-17; control N = 245,962) UKB (PCL-6, control N = 146,875)
case N Case-Control Case-only case N Case-Control Case-only
Beta SE P Beta SE P Beta SE P Beta SE P
Total sample 73,074 2.89 0.06 < 10−300 0.112 0.01 4.08 × 10−29 8942 0.58 0.034 3.98 × 10−66 0.01 0.004 0.001
Onset after PCL assessment 12,267 2.19 0.13 1.12 × 10−63 0.192 0.075 0.011 167 0.25 0.234 0.391 −0.57 0.533 0.287
Onset same-year PCL assessment 4646 2.71 0.21 4.23 × 10−38 590 0.44 0.125 3.94 × 10−4
Onset before PCL assessment 56,161 3.03 0.07 < 10−300 0.11 0.014 6.95 × 10−16 8185 0.6 0.035 7.11 × 10−66 0.011 0.005 0.027

In the case-control analysis, the PCL total scores of controls were compared with those of CAD cases (total sample and stratified by the timing of their cardiac disease onset with respect to PCL assessment). In the case-only analysis, we tested the association of PCL total scores with the temporal difference (years) between the time of CAD diagnosis and the time of PCL assessment. In MVP, the analyses were corrected for age, sex, income, self-reported ethnicity, and self-reported racial background. In UKB, the analyses were corrected for age, sex, Townsend deprivation index, and self-reported ethnic background.